ERPNextManage accounting, inventory, and operations
vs
Service FusionField Service Management Made Easy
Comparison · Field Service Management · weekly run Nov 3
ERPNext vs Service Fusion
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Service Fusion is the stronger AI pick in Field Service Management: it has a visibility score of 11.5 versus 0 for ERPNext.
Choose ERPNext if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (67% vs 29% positive)
- You need ISO 9001:2015 or ISO 27001:2022 or SOC 2 Type II coverage
- Open-source with broad functional coverage
- Free to license with no licensing cost
Choose Service Fusion if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (11.5 vs 0)
- avoids per-user fees for multi-technician teams
- strong for HVAC and plumbing field service
- covers dispatching, scheduling and field operations
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | ERPNext | Service Fusion |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0% | 11.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Field Service Management | #38 | #10 |
| Share of voice | 0% | 3.7% |
| Mentions this run | 0 | 20 |
| Positive in AI answers | 67% | 29% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
ERPNext 0pp · Service Fusion 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Service Fusion leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ERPNextService Fusion
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0ERPNext ranked higher
0Service Fusion ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | ERPNext | Service Fusion |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | $208 / mo |
| Free plan | — | No |
| Deployment | Docker or SaaS, with Frappe Cloud offering EU and US data residency; self-hosting is also possible. | — |
| Compliance | ISO 9001:2015, ISO 27001:2022, SOC 2 Type II | — |
| Support | Certified partners through Find a Partner | Phone, Email, Live chat, Knowledge base |
| Founded | 2008 | — |
| Headquarters | Mumbai, Maharashtra, India | — |
| Employees | 51–200 | — |
| Funding | Investment from Zerodha/Rainmatter · $1M raised | Debt financing (Saratoga Partners) · $10M raised |
| Best for | Small to mid-sized organisations | Service contractors and field service businesses such as HVAC, plumbing, electrical, locksmith and garage door companies. |
Plans side by side
ERPNext
Pricing not available.
Service Fusion
Starter$208Per month, billed annually (month-to-month: $245)
Plus$325Per month, billed annually (month-to-month: $382)
Pro$533Per month, billed annually (month-to-month: $627)
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
ERPNext
- Open-source with broad functional coverage
- Free to license with no licensing cost
- Affordable option for smaller businesses
- Covers accounting, CRM, inventory, HR and projects
- Transparent pricing
Service Fusion
- avoids per-user fees for multi-technician teams
- strong for HVAC and plumbing field service
- covers dispatching, scheduling and field operations
- proportionate choice for growing 5–20-technician companies
- generally requires contacting sales for pricing
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “ERPNext vs Service Fusion”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/erpnext-vs-service-fusion, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.