FetcherThe best talent, fetched for you
vs
HiredRecruiting
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
Fetcher vs Hired
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Hired is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 3.3 versus 1.2 for Fetcher.
Choose Fetcher if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (100% vs 0% positive)
- Advertised high discount percentage
Choose Hired if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.3 vs 1.2)
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Fetcher | Hired |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.2% | 3.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #51 | #25 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 0.7% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 100% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Fetcher 0pp · Hired 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Hired leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
FetcherHired
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Fetcher ranked higher
0Hired ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Fetcher | Hired |
|---|---|---|
| Support | Email support | — |
| Founded | 2016 | — |
| Headquarters | New York, NY, US | Jacksonville, Florida, USA (parent LHH) |
| Employees | 51–200 | 5,000+ |
| Funding | Series B | Series D · $133M raised |
| Best for | Talent acquisition and recruiting teams that want AI sourcing with human review of each candidate batch | Employers hiring tech and sales talent |
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Fetcher
- Advertised high discount percentage
Hired
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Fetcher vs Hired”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/fetcher-vs-hired, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.