FloatThe #1 rated resource management software
vs
LinearThe product development system for teams and agents
Comparison · Project Management · weekly run Nov 3
Float vs Linear
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Linear is the stronger AI pick in Project Management: it has a visibility score of 7.9 versus 0 for Float.
Choose Float if…
- You want a lower entry price ($7 vs $10)
- You need SOC 2 or B Corp certification coverage
Choose Linear if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (7.9 vs 0)
- You want a free plan to start
- You need SOC 2 Type II or HIPAA (BAA available) or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 coverage
- Fast issue tracking for software engineering teams
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Float | Linear |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0% | 7.9% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Project Management | #48 | #12 |
| Share of voice | 0% | 2% |
| Mentions this run | 0 | 11 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 54% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Float 0pp · Linear 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Linear leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
FloatLinear
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Float ranked higher
0Linear ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Float | Linear |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | $7 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $10 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No · 30-day trial | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud-based | Cloud-hosted SaaS; workspace data can be stored in the European Union or the United States |
| Compliance | SOC 2, GDPR, B Corp certification | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, HIPAA (BAA available), ISO/IEC 27001:2022 |
| Support | 24/7 AI chat with Mon–Fri human support, Designated customer success contact on Enterprise, Priority support and custom SLAs on Enterprise | Priority support (Enterprise plan), Account manager (Enterprise plan) |
| Founded | 2011 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Remote | San Francisco, California, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | — |
| Funding | — | Series C · $134M raised |
| Best for | Agencies, professional services firms and in-house delivery teams that need to see who is doing what, at what cost, across every project. | Product and engineering teams that build software and want humans and AI agents working in one shared system |
Plans side by side
Float
Starter$7per scheduled person/month
Pro$12per scheduled person/month
EnterpriseCustomannual contract only
Linear
Free$0free for everyone
Basic$10per user/month, billed yearly
Business$16per user/month, billed yearly
EnterpriseCustomannual billing only
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Float
Profile in progress.
Linear
- Fast issue tracking for software engineering teams
- Generous free plan
- Transparent, scalable pricing tiers
- Good fit for SaaS and tech product teams
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Float vs Linear”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/float-vs-linear, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.