FlutterFlow vs Supabase
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
FlutterFlow is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 5.8 versus 3.6 for Supabase, and ranks ahead in 80% of the answers that name both.
Choose FlutterFlow if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (5.8 vs 3.6)
- AI answers describe it more positively (57% vs 18% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type 1 coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
Choose Supabase if…
- You want a lower entry price ($25 vs $39)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO 27001 or HIPAA (BAA available) coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | FlutterFlow | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 5.8% | 3.6% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.4% | New |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #18 | #27 |
| Share of voice | 1.4% | 0.9% |
| Mentions this run | 9 | 6 |
| Positive in AI answers | 57% | 18% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
FlutterFlow −0.40000000000000036pp · Supabase +3.6pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
FlutterFlow leads on 2 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
5 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | FlutterFlow | Supabase |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best Low-Code & No-Code tools in 2026? | ChatGPT | #2 | #12 |
| Top low-code platform options for B2B SaaS companies | ChatGPT | #4 | #7 |
| Best low-code platform for startups | ChatGPT | #4 | #3 |
| Best low-code platform for startups | AI Mode | #2 | #5 |
| Compare the leading Low-Code & No-Code platforms | ChatGPT | #13 | #16 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | FlutterFlow | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $39 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $25 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Browser-based builder; deploys to the App Store, Play Store and web | Hosted cloud in AWS regions across the US, EU and Asia Pacific, or self-hosted open source |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 1 | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA (BAA available) |
| Support | Account & Billing Support, Community Support, Email Support, In-App Support | Community support (Free plan), Email support (Pro plan), Priority email support and SLAs (Team plan), 24x7 premium enterprise support and private Slack channel (Enterprise plan) |
| Founded | 2020 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Mountain View, CA | Remote-first, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Series A · $28M raised | Series D · $1000M raised |
| Best for | Solo founders shipping a first app, and enterprise teams scaling internal tools | Teams building production applications on Postgres that want auth, storage, realtime and vector search in one backend |
Plans side by side
FlutterFlow
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
FlutterFlow
- Best for building native mobile apps for iOS and Android
- Strong for cross-platform mobile and web apps
- High visual customizability
- Good for high-performance native apps
- Code ownership and option to add custom code later
Supabase
- Integrates smoothly with Firebase and Supabase
- Zero extra infrastructure when already running Postgres via Supabase
- Pay nothing extra for pgvector on an existing database
- Minimal operational overhead for existing Postgres clusters
- Offers vector search via pgvector, with customers paying only for the database
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “FlutterFlow vs Supabase”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/flutterflow-vs-supabase, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.