Fly.ioLaunch computers for agents, code sandboxes, and your next app.
vs
HarnessAI Platform for the Autonomous SDLC
Comparison · CI/CD · weekly run Nov 3
Fly.io vs Harness
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Harness is the stronger AI pick in CI/CD: it has a visibility score of 12.3 versus 0 for Fly.io.
Choose Fly.io if…
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or HIPAA (BAA pre-signed on HIPAA package) coverage
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
Choose Harness if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (12.3 vs 0)
- You need SOC 1 Type II or SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or FedRAMP 20x Class A or GDPR coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Fly.io | Harness |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0% | 12.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in CI/CD | #38 | #11 |
| Share of voice | 0% | 3.7% |
| Mentions this run | 0 | 23 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 52% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Fly.io 0pp · Harness 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Harness leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Fly.ioHarness
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Fly.io ranked higher
0Harness ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Fly.io | Harness |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $38 / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Operated by Fly.io on its own hardware across 18+ regions worldwide, deployed from GitHub or the fly CLI. | Harness platform with a Harness Delegate that runs inside the customer's VPC or cluster; a self-managed platform is available as an Enterprise add-on. |
| Integrations | — | 40+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, HIPAA (BAA pre-signed on HIPAA package) | SOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, FedRAMP 20x Class A, GDPR |
| Support | Community support (free), Paid Standard, Premium and Enterprise support tiers, Dedicated Slack channel on Premium and Enterprise | Standard support with a dedicated customer success manager (Essentials), Premier support and dedicated account manager (Enterprise), Community support (Free plan), Professional Services as an add-on |
| Founded | 2017 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Chicago, Illinois, United States | San Francisco, California, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Seed · $136M raised | Series E · $570M raised |
| Best for | Developers and teams that want to ship apps, AI agents and code sandboxes without managing infrastructure. | Enterprise engineering and platform teams that want CI, CD, security and cost controls on one governed platform. |
Plans side by side
Harness
Free Plan$0not stated
Essentials PlanCustomnot stated
Enterprise PlanCustomnot stated
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Fly.io
Profile in progress.
Harness
- Strong enterprise release governance
- Deployment safety and automated rollback
- Deployment verification and progressive delivery
- AI-driven pipeline optimization
- Analyst recognition as a strong continuous delivery vendor
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Fly.io vs Harness”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/fly-io-vs-harness, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.