Skip to content
SlateIndex
Fly.ioLaunch computers for agents, code sandboxes, and your next app.
vs
HarnessAI Platform for the Autonomous SDLC
Comparison · CI/CD · weekly run Nov 3

Fly.io vs Harness

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Harness is the stronger AI pick in CI/CD: it has a visibility score of 12.3 versus 0 for Fly.io.

Choose Fly.io if…

  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 or HIPAA (BAA pre-signed on HIPAA package) coverage
  • Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers

Choose Harness if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (12.3 vs 0)
  • You need SOC 1 Type II or SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or FedRAMP 20x Class A or GDPR coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
  • Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than usage-based

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Fly.io Harness
Visibility score0%12.3%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in CI/CD#38#11
Share of voice0%3.7%
Mentions this run023
Positive in AI answers—52%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Fly.io 0%

Fly.io 0pp · Harness 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Harness leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
0%
16.9%
AI Mode
0%
6.1%
Perplexity
0%
13.9%
Fly.ioHarness

Head to head in AI answers

0 engine answers name both brands

0Fly.io ranked higher
0Harness ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionFly.ioHarness
Pricing modelUsage-basedFlat tiers
Entry priceFree; paid from $38 / moContact sales
Free planYesYes
DeploymentOperated by Fly.io on its own hardware across 18+ regions worldwide, deployed from GitHub or the fly CLI.Harness platform with a Harness Delegate that runs inside the customer's VPC or cluster; a self-managed platform is available as an Enterprise add-on.
Integrations—40+
ComplianceSOC 2 Type 2, HIPAA (BAA pre-signed on HIPAA package)SOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, FedRAMP 20x Class A, GDPR
SupportCommunity support (free), Paid Standard, Premium and Enterprise support tiers, Dedicated Slack channel on Premium and EnterpriseStandard support with a dedicated customer success manager (Essentials), Premier support and dedicated account manager (Enterprise), Community support (Free plan), Professional Services as an add-on
Founded20172017
HeadquartersChicago, Illinois, United StatesSan Francisco, California, United States
Employees51–2001,001–5,000
FundingSeed · $136M raisedSeries E · $570M raised
Best forDevelopers and teams that want to ship apps, AI agents and code sandboxes without managing infrastructure.Enterprise engineering and platform teams that want CI, CD, security and cost controls on one governed platform.

Plans side by side

Fly.io

Basic$38month
Starter$72month
Launch$282month
Scale$962month
Performance$1,922month
Fly.io pricing

Harness

Free Plan$0not stated
Essentials PlanCustomnot stated
Enterprise PlanCustomnot stated
Harness pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Fly.io

Profile in progress.

Harness

  • Strong enterprise release governance
  • Deployment safety and automated rollback
  • Deployment verification and progressive delivery
  • AI-driven pipeline optimization
  • Analyst recognition as a strong continuous delivery vendor

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Fly.io vs Harness”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/fly-io-vs-harness, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.