FountainThe AI-native OS built for the global frontline workforce.
vs
LoxoThe AI recruiting platform for scaling firms
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
Fountain vs Loxo
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Loxo is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 1.9 versus 0.6 for Fountain, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose Fountain if…
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001:2022 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
Choose Loxo if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.9 vs 0.6)
- You need more native integrations (100+ vs 40+)
- AI answers describe it more positively (17% vs 0% positive)
- 7-day free trial
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Fountain | Loxo |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.6% | 1.9% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #60 | #40 |
| Share of voice | 0.4% | 0.9% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 5 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 17% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Fountain 0pp · Loxo 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Loxo leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
FountainLoxo
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
1Fountain ranked higher
0Loxo ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Fountain | Loxo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Official website of the top recruiting platform vendors | Perplexity | #14 | #15 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Fountain | Loxo |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | $149 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | No · 7-day trial |
| Integrations | 40+ | 100+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001:2022 | — |
| Support | — | Dedicated success team and priority support on Enterprise plans, Free migration for Core teams of 3+ seats, with guided self-serve tooling below that |
| Founded | 2014 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA | Austin, Texas |
| Employees | 201–500 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series C · $185M raised | Growth investment led by Tritium Partners · $115M raised |
| Best for | High-volume employers hiring hourly frontline workers, such as food and beverage, hospitality and on-demand services. | Scaling recruiting firms, including executive search, recruiting, staffing and RPO firms, and in-house talent teams |
Plans side by side
Fountain
Pricing not available.
Loxo
Core$149per user / month, billed annually
ProfessionalCustombilled annually, contact sales for pricing
EnterpriseCustomcustom annual agreement
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Fountain
Profile in progress.
Loxo
- 7-day free trial
- High per-user pricing
- Annual-only plans paid upfront
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Fountain vs Loxo”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/fountain-vs-loxo, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.