Skip to content
SlateIndex
LoxoThe AI recruiting platform for scaling firms
vs
WorkableAll-in-one HR software
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3

Loxo vs Workable

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Workable is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 30.1 versus 1.9 for Loxo, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.

Choose Loxo if…

  • You want a lower entry price ($149 vs $299)
  • Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
  • 7-day free trial

Choose Workable if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (30.1 vs 1.9)
  • You need more native integrations (270+ vs 100+)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (44% vs 17% positive)
  • You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 coverage

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Loxo Workable
Visibility score1.9%30.1%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Recruiting#40#2
Share of voice0.9%7.2%
Mentions this run538
Positive in AI answers17%44%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Loxo 2%

Loxo 0pp · Workable 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Workable leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
1.3%
34.1%
AI Mode
1.3%
29.4%
Perplexity
3.1%
26.7%
LoxoWorkable

Head to head in AI answers

4 engine answers name both brands

0Loxo ranked higher
4Workable ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionLoxoWorkable
Pricing modelPer seatFlat tiers
Entry price$149 per seat / mo$299 / mo
Free planNo · 7-day trialNo · 15-day trial
Deployment—Cloud-based SaaS
Integrations100+270+
Compliance—ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3
SupportDedicated success team and priority support on Enterprise plans, Free migration for Core teams of 3+ seats, with guided self-serve tooling below thatPriority support on Premier and Enterprise plans
Founded20122012
HeadquartersAustin, TexasBoston, Massachusetts, USA
Employees51–200201–500
FundingGrowth investment led by Tritium Partners · $115M raisedSeries C, led by Zouk Capital · $84M raised
Best forScaling recruiting firms, including executive search, recruiting, staffing and RPO firms, and in-house talent teamsCompanies of any size that care about time-to-value and ease of use and want a system that is fast to implement and easy to adopt, with a focus on small and medium-sized businesses.

Plans side by side

Loxo

Core$149per user / month, billed annually
ProfessionalCustombilled annually, contact sales for pricing
EnterpriseCustomcustom annual agreement
Loxo pricing

Workable

Standard$299month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Premier$599month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Enterprise$719month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Workable pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Loxo

  • 7-day free trial
  • High per-user pricing
  • Annual-only plans paid upfront

Workable

  • fast deployment and ease of use
  • intuitive automation and candidate tracking
  • transparent pricing and free trial
  • all-in-one ATS and hiring platform
  • candidate sourcing
  • costs more than lightweight ATS options

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “Loxo vs Workable”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/loxo-vs-workable, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.