LoxoThe AI recruiting platform for scaling firms
vs
WorkableAll-in-one HR software
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
Loxo vs Workable
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Workable is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 30.1 versus 1.9 for Loxo, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Loxo if…
- You want a lower entry price ($149 vs $299)
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
- 7-day free trial
Choose Workable if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (30.1 vs 1.9)
- You need more native integrations (270+ vs 100+)
- AI answers describe it more positively (44% vs 17% positive)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Loxo | Workable |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.9% | 30.1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #40 | #2 |
| Share of voice | 0.9% | 7.2% |
| Mentions this run | 5 | 38 |
| Positive in AI answers | 17% | 44% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Loxo 0pp · Workable 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Workable leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
LoxoWorkable
Head to head in AI answers
4 engine answers name both brands
0Loxo ranked higher
4Workable ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Loxo | Workable |
|---|---|---|---|
| How much does a recruiting platform cost per month? | AI Mode | #6 | #4 |
| Which recruiting platform offers a free trial? | Perplexity | #6 | #1 |
| Which recruiting tools offer annual discounts? | Perplexity | #11 | #6 |
| Official website of the top recruiting platform vendors | Perplexity | #15 | #3 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Loxo | Workable |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | $149 per seat / mo | $299 / mo |
| Free plan | No · 7-day trial | No · 15-day trial |
| Deployment | — | Cloud-based SaaS |
| Integrations | 100+ | 270+ |
| Compliance | — | ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3 |
| Support | Dedicated success team and priority support on Enterprise plans, Free migration for Core teams of 3+ seats, with guided self-serve tooling below that | Priority support on Premier and Enterprise plans |
| Founded | 2012 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Austin, Texas | Boston, Massachusetts, USA |
| Employees | 51–200 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Growth investment led by Tritium Partners · $115M raised | Series C, led by Zouk Capital · $84M raised |
| Best for | Scaling recruiting firms, including executive search, recruiting, staffing and RPO firms, and in-house talent teams | Companies of any size that care about time-to-value and ease of use and want a system that is fast to implement and easy to adopt, with a focus on small and medium-sized businesses. |
Plans side by side
Loxo
Core$149per user / month, billed annually
ProfessionalCustombilled annually, contact sales for pricing
EnterpriseCustomcustom annual agreement
Workable
Standard$299month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Premier$599month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Enterprise$719month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Loxo
- 7-day free trial
- High per-user pricing
- Annual-only plans paid upfront
Workable
- fast deployment and ease of use
- intuitive automation and candidate tracking
- transparent pricing and free trial
- all-in-one ATS and hiring platform
- candidate sourcing
- costs more than lightweight ATS options
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Loxo vs Workable”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/loxo-vs-workable, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.