GalileoDon't just monitor AI failures. Stop them.
vs
LangfuseOpen Source Agent Evals & Observability
Comparison · MLOps Platforms · weekly run Nov 2
Galileo vs Langfuse
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Galileo is the stronger AI pick in MLOps Platforms: it has a visibility score of 0.4 versus 0.3 for Langfuse.
Choose Galileo if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (0.4 vs 0.3)
Choose Langfuse if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (50% vs 0% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need ISO 27001 or HIPAA-ready region or GDPR coverage
- Discounted cloud pricing for qualifying early-stage startups
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Galileo | Langfuse |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.4% | 0.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in MLOps Platforms | #48 | #51 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 0.2% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 50% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Galileo 0pp · Langfuse 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Galileo leads on 1 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
GalileoLangfuse
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Galileo ranked higher
0Langfuse ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Galileo | Langfuse |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Usage-based |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $29 / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | SaaS, Virtual Private Cloud, On-Premises | Langfuse Cloud in US, EU, Japan and HIPAA regions, or self-hosted under the MIT license |
| Integrations | — | 100+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, HIPAA-ready region, GDPR |
| Support | — | Community support via GitHub, In-app support, Private Slack or MS Teams channel on Pro and Enterprise plans, Named lead support engineer on Enterprise plans |
| Funding | Series B · $68M raised | Seed · $4M raised |
| Best for | AI teams running GenAI applications and agents at enterprise scale | Engineering teams building LLM applications and AI agents that want open-source, self-hostable tracing and evaluation |
Plans side by side
Galileo
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Galileo
Profile in progress.
Langfuse
- Discounted cloud pricing for qualifying early-stage startups
- Well suited to evaluating and debugging LLM or agent behavior
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Galileo vs Langfuse”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/galileo-vs-langfuse, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.