GetResponse vs Iterable
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
GetResponse is the stronger AI pick in Email Marketing: it has a visibility score of 8.7 versus 2.6 for Iterable, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose GetResponse if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (8.7 vs 2.6)
- AI answers describe it more positively (33% vs 29% positive)
- You need PCI DSS or GDPR coverage
- Annual plan discounts of about 18% to 30%
Choose Iterable if…
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO 27001 or HIPAA or Data Privacy Framework or Global Cross-Border Privacy Rules or Global Privacy Rules for Processors coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
- Good fit for growth-stage, retail, and media organizations running cross-channel campaigns
- Suited to high-growth, mobile-heavy consumer startups needing real-time multi-channel engagement
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | GetResponse | Iterable |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 8.7% | 2.6% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Email Marketing | #13 | #25 |
| Share of voice | 2.7% | 0.9% |
| Mentions this run | 15 | 5 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | 29% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
GetResponse 0pp · Iterable 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
GetResponse leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | GetResponse | Iterable |
|---|---|---|---|
| Official website of the top email marketing platform vendors | ChatGPT | #7 | #17 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | GetResponse | Iterable |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $19 / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Integrations | 150+ | — |
| Compliance | PCI DSS, GDPR | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, Data Privacy Framework, Global Cross-Border Privacy Rules, Global Privacy Rules for Processors |
| Support | 24/7 chatbot in all languages, Live chat in English and Polish, Email support in English, Polish, German, Spanish, Portuguese, French and Italian, Dedicated Customer Experience Manager on Enterprise plan | Community and expert-led programs |
| Founded | 1998 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Gdańsk, Poland | San Francisco, California |
| Employees | 201–500 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Bootstrapped | Series E · $342M raised |
| Best for | Entrepreneurs, ecommerce stores and global brands that want email, automation and landing pages in one platform. | Global brands that want marketers to run real-time, cross-channel engagement without engineering dependency. |
Plans side by side
GetResponse
Iterable
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
GetResponse
- Annual plan discounts of about 18% to 30%
- 14-day free trial without a credit card
- Strong for webinars
- Integrated content monetization and landing page funnels
Iterable
- Good fit for growth-stage, retail, and media organizations running cross-channel campaigns
- Suited to high-growth, mobile-heavy consumer startups needing real-time multi-channel engagement
- Strong for product-led growth and behavioral, real-time cross-channel messaging
- Named among leading analyst-backed marketing automation shortlists
- Good choice for high-scale consumer engagement
- Pricing not transparent; generally requires custom quotes
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “GetResponse vs Iterable”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/getresponse-vs-iterable, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.