GitLab vs Sourcegraph Cody
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
GitLab is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 11.2 versus 7.7 for Sourcegraph Cody, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose GitLab if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (11.2 vs 7.7)
- You want a free plan to start
- AI answers describe it more positively (46% vs 0% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 (GitLab.com and GitLab Dedicated) or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017:2015 or ISO/IEC 27018:2019 or GDPR compliance or CSA Trusted Cloud Provider or FedRAMP Moderate baseline (GitLab Dedicated for Government) or GovRAMP authorized coverage
Choose Sourcegraph Cody if…
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 coverage
- Free trial available for 30 days
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | GitLab | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 11.2% | 7.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Coding Assistants | #7 | #12 |
| Share of voice | 3.1% | 3.3% |
| Mentions this run | 15 | 16 |
| Positive in AI answers | 46% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
GitLab 0pp · Sourcegraph Cody 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
GitLab leads on 2 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
4 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | GitLab | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|---|
| How do I choose an AI coding assistant for a mid-market team? | Perplexity | #1 | #5 |
| What should an AI coding assistant integrate with? | Perplexity | #1 | #2 |
| Top AI coding assistant options for B2B SaaS companies | ChatGPT | #10 | #11 |
| Top AI coding assistant options for B2B SaaS companies | Perplexity | #10 | #11 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | GitLab | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $29 per seat / mo | $16,000 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Deployment | GitLab.com, self-managed and GitLab Dedicated | Single-tenant cloud, self-hosted, or bring-your-own cloud for air-gapped environments |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2 (GitLab.com and GitLab Dedicated), ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017:2015, ISO/IEC 27018:2019, GDPR compliance, CSA Trusted Cloud Provider, FedRAMP Moderate baseline (GitLab Dedicated for Government), GovRAMP authorized | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 |
| Support | Priority support with 24x5 coverage and SLAs (Premium), Upgrade Support | 24×5 support, Customer success manager, Optional premium support |
| Founded | 2014 | — |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California, US | San Francisco, California, US |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 51–200 |
| Funding | PIPE | Later-stage deal · $225M raised |
| Best for | Scaling development teams and enterprises that need advanced security and compliance capabilities | Enterprise engineering teams working on large, complex codebases |
Plans side by side
GitLab
Sourcegraph Cody
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
GitLab
- All-in-one DevSecOps platform
- Integrated security scanning
- Robust built-in CI/CD pipelines
- Free tier for individuals and open-source projects
- High adoption and user ratings
Sourcegraph Cody
- Free trial available for 30 days
- Pricing lacks transparency for small teams due to reliance on custom sales quotes
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “GitLab vs Sourcegraph Cody”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/gitlab-vs-sourcegraph-cody, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.