GlideAI app builder for internal business apps
vs
SupabaseBuild in a weekend. Scale to millions.
Comparison · Low-Code & No-Code · weekly run Nov 3
Glide vs Supabase
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Glide is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 4.8 versus 3.6 for Supabase, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose Glide if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (4.8 vs 3.6)
- You need GDPR or CCPA coverage
- Free plan for simple data-driven apps
- Good for mobile-first MVPs
Choose Supabase if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (18% vs 15% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need ISO 27001 or HIPAA (BAA available) coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Glide | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 4.8% | 3.6% |
| Change vs last week | down−2.7% | New |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #22 | #27 |
| Share of voice | 1.7% | 0.9% |
| Mentions this run | 11 | 6 |
| Positive in AI answers | 15% | 18% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Glide −2.7pp · Supabase +3.6pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Glide leads on 1 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
GlideSupabase
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
0Glide ranked higher
2Supabase ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Glide | Supabase |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best Low-Code & No-Code tools in 2026? | ChatGPT | #15 | #12 |
| Best low-code platform for startups | ChatGPT | #10 | #3 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Glide | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $25 / mo | Free; paid from $25 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted web and mobile (PWA) apps, hosted on Google Cloud Platform in Iowa, USA. | Hosted cloud in AWS regions across the US, EU and Asia Pacific, or self-hosted open source |
| Integrations | 1045+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR, CCPA | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA (BAA available) |
| Support | Help Center, Community, Human support, Priority support | Community support (Free plan), Email support (Pro plan), Priority email support and SLAs (Team plan), 24x7 premium enterprise support and private Slack channel (Enterprise plan) |
| Founded | 2018 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California, USA | Remote-first, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Series A · $20M raised | Series D · $1000M raised |
| Best for | Operations and back-office teams that run on spreadsheets and need internal apps quickly. | Teams building production applications on Postgres that want auth, storage, realtime and vector search in one backend |
Plans side by side
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Glide
- Free plan for simple data-driven apps
- Good for mobile-first MVPs
- Turns structured data sources into polished mobile and web apps
- Beginner-friendly no-code platform
- Suited to simple business apps and accessible no-code work by business teams
Supabase
- Integrates smoothly with Firebase and Supabase
- Zero extra infrastructure when already running Postgres via Supabase
- Pay nothing extra for pgvector on an existing database
- Minimal operational overhead for existing Postgres clusters
- Offers vector search via pgvector, with customers paying only for the database
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Glide vs Supabase”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/glide-vs-supabase, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.