GoAccessVisual Web Log Analyzer
vs
Parse.lyOwn your audience. Own your future.
Comparison · Web Analytics · weekly run Nov 2
GoAccess vs Parse.ly
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
GoAccess is the stronger AI pick in Web Analytics: it has a visibility score of 0.7 versus 0 for Parse.ly.
Choose GoAccess if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (0.7 vs 0)
Choose Parse.ly if…
- You need SOC 2 or ISO 27001 or GDPR or CCPA coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | GoAccess | Parse.ly |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.7% | 0% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Web Analytics | #34 | #42 |
| Share of voice | 0.3% | 0% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 0 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
GoAccess 0pp · Parse.ly 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
GoAccess leads on 1 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
GoAccessParse.ly
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0GoAccess ranked higher
0Parse.ly ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | GoAccess | Parse.ly |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | Runs in a terminal on *nix systems or through a browser, and can run against an access log file or live log input. | Cloud-based |
| Compliance | — | SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, CCPA |
| Founded | — | 2009 |
| Headquarters | — | San Francisco |
| Employees | — | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | — | Series A · $13M raised |
| Best for | System administrators who need fast visual statistics and security monitoring from web server logs, including over SSH. | Newsrooms, publishers and marketing teams that want to understand content performance and build reader loyalty. |
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “GoAccess vs Parse.ly”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/goaccess-vs-parse-ly, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.