Skip to content
SlateIndex
GoodDataAnalytics, AI, and agents on one data serving plane
vs
MetabaseOpen source AI analytics you can verify
Comparison · Business Intelligence · weekly run Nov 2

GoodData vs Metabase

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Metabase is the stronger AI pick in Business Intelligence: it has a visibility score of 21.7 versus 0.9 for GoodData, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.

Choose GoodData if…

  • AI answers describe it more positively (67% vs 63% positive)
  • You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
  • You need ISO 27001 or WCAG 2.1 AA coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)

Choose Metabase if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (21.7 vs 0.9)
  • You want a free plan to start
  • You need SOC 1 or CCPA coverage
  • Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 2

Metric GoodData Metabase
Visibility score0.9%21.7%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Business Intelligence#30#5
Share of voice0.5%5.2%
Mentions this run327
Positive in AI answers67%63%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2GoodData 1%

GoodData 0pp · Metabase 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Metabase leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
1.9%
25.9%
AI Mode
0%
18.7%
Perplexity
0.9%
20.6%
GoodDataMetabase

Head to head in AI answers

2 engine answers name both brands

0GoodData ranked higher
2Metabase ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionGoodDataMetabase
Pricing modelFlat tiersPer seat
Entry priceContact salesFree; paid from $100 per seat / mo
Free planNo · 30-day trialYes
DeploymentFully managed SaaS on AWS and Azure, with dedicated cluster, multi-region and self-hosted options on demandSelf-hosted or Metabase Cloud, with air-gapped deployment available on Enterprise
Integrations—237+
ComplianceSOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR, WCAG 2.1 AASOC 1, SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, CCPA
Support24/7 technical support worldwide, Community support through a Slack channel, Enterprise: 24/7 prioritized SLAs and a dedicated customer success manager, Enterprise: 99.5% guaranteed uptime SLAEmail, Support form, Slack, Microsoft Teams
Founded20072014
HeadquartersSan Francisco, California, United States—
Employees201–50051–200
FundingLast raise (CB Insights)Series B · $43M raised
Best forSmall and medium companies on the Professional plan, and large enterprises on the Enterprise plan, that build embedded analytics, data products and governed AI on one platformTeams that want self-service analytics without relying on engineers, and software companies that need to embed analytics in their product

Plans side by side

GoodData

ProfessionalCustomplatform fee + per workspace
EnterpriseCustomcustom use-case-based pricing
GoodData pricing

Metabase

Open Source$0free, self-hosted, unlimited users
Starter$100month (5 users included, +$6/user/month)
Pro$575month (10 users included, +$12/user/month)
EnterpriseCustomcustom pricing (starts at $20,000 / year)
Metabase pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

GoodData

  • Embedded analytics for customer-facing SaaS products

    Metabase

    • Free open-source edition for self-hosting
    • Easy to deploy and user-friendly
    • No-code visual builder and SQL for non-technical users
    • Affordable, low-cost BI
    • Best default starting point for startups and small teams
    • Self-hosting means handling hosting, security, backups and updates yourself
    • Extra token-based AI or custom usage fees on top of plans

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “GoodData vs Metabase”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/gooddata-vs-metabase, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.