GoodData vs Qlik Sense
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Qlik Sense is the stronger AI pick in Business Intelligence: it has a visibility score of 28.8 versus 0.9 for GoodData, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose GoodData if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (67% vs 33% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or GDPR or WCAG 2.1 AA coverage
- Embedded analytics for customer-facing SaaS products
Choose Qlik Sense if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (28.8 vs 0.9)
- You need ISO 27001:2022 or ISO 27017 or SOC 2 Type 2 or HITRUST CSF or German BSI C5 attestation or FedRAMP Moderate or DoD IL2 or GovRAMP Moderate or ISO/IEC 27018 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or TISAX or HIPAA or CJIS or TX-RAMP coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Proprietary associative engine for real-time data exploration
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | GoodData | Qlik Sense |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.9% | 28.8% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Business Intelligence | #30 | #4 |
| Share of voice | 0.5% | 8% |
| Mentions this run | 3 | 42 |
| Positive in AI answers | 67% | 33% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
GoodData 0pp · Qlik Sense 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Qlik Sense leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | GoodData | Qlik Sense |
|---|---|---|---|
| Top business intelligence tool options for B2B SaaS companies | Perplexity | #12 | #8 |
| Official website of the top business intelligence tool vendors | ChatGPT | #18 | #6 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | GoodData | Qlik Sense |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | — |
| Entry price | Contact sales | — |
| Free plan | No · 30-day trial | — |
| Deployment | Fully managed SaaS on AWS and Azure, with dedicated cluster, multi-region and self-hosted options on demand | Cloud, on-premises and hybrid |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR, WCAG 2.1 AA | ISO 27001:2022, ISO 27017, SOC 2 Type 2, HITRUST CSF, German BSI C5 attestation, FedRAMP Moderate, DoD IL2, GovRAMP Moderate, ISO/IEC 27018, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, TISAX, HIPAA, CJIS, TX-RAMP |
| Support | 24/7 technical support worldwide, Community support through a Slack channel, Enterprise: 24/7 prioritized SLAs and a dedicated customer success manager, Enterprise: 99.5% guaranteed uptime SLA | — |
| Founded | 2007 | 1993 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California, United States | King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, United States |
| Employees | 201–500 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Last raise (CB Insights) | Minority stake sale to ADIA subsidiary and new Thoma Bravo equity investment |
| Best for | Small and medium companies on the Professional plan, and large enterprises on the Enterprise plan, that build embedded analytics, data products and governed AI on one platform | — |
Plans side by side
GoodData
Qlik Sense
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
GoodData
- Embedded analytics for customer-facing SaaS products
Qlik Sense
- Proprietary associative engine for real-time data exploration
- Robust data integration capabilities
- Strong, trusted data governance
- Robust AI-driven insights and conversational AI
- Frequently recommended by analysts for BI shortlists
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “GoodData vs Qlik Sense”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/gooddata-vs-qlik-sense, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.