GoodData vs Sigma Computing
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Sigma Computing is the stronger AI pick in Business Intelligence: it has a visibility score of 8 versus 0.9 for GoodData, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose GoodData if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (67% vs 39% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need WCAG 2.1 AA coverage
- Embedded analytics for customer-facing SaaS products
Choose Sigma Computing if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (8 vs 0.9)
- You need SOC 1 Type II or SOC 3 or HIPAA or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or ISO 27701 or PCI DSS or CCPA or EU-US DPF coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
- Spreadsheet-like, Excel-style interface on a cloud data warehouse
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | GoodData | Sigma Computing |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.9% | 8% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Business Intelligence | #30 | #11 |
| Share of voice | 0.5% | 3.4% |
| Mentions this run | 3 | 18 |
| Positive in AI answers | 67% | 39% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
GoodData 0pp · Sigma Computing 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Sigma Computing leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
3 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | GoodData | Sigma Computing |
|---|---|---|---|
| Top business intelligence tool options for B2B SaaS companies | ChatGPT | #8 | #4 |
| Top business intelligence tool options for B2B SaaS companies | Perplexity | #12 | #5 |
| Official website of the top business intelligence tool vendors | ChatGPT | #18 | #16 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | GoodData | Sigma Computing |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | — |
| Entry price | Contact sales | — |
| Free plan | No · 30-day trial | — |
| Deployment | Fully managed SaaS on AWS and Azure, with dedicated cluster, multi-region and self-hosted options on demand | Cloud-native, queries the customer's cloud data warehouse live |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR, WCAG 2.1 AA | SOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, HIPAA, ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, ISO 27701, PCI DSS, GDPR, CCPA, EU-US DPF |
| Support | 24/7 technical support worldwide, Community support through a Slack channel, Enterprise: 24/7 prioritized SLAs and a dedicated customer success manager, Enterprise: 99.5% guaranteed uptime SLA | Help Desk, Community, Documentation, Training |
| Founded | 2007 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California, United States | San Francisco, California, US |
| Employees | 201–500 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Last raise (CB Insights) | Series E |
| Best for | Small and medium companies on the Professional plan, and large enterprises on the Enterprise plan, that build embedded analytics, data products and governed AI on one platform | Business and technical teams that want governed apps, dashboards and agents on live cloud warehouse data, with IT keeping control of security and spend. |
Plans side by side
GoodData
Sigma Computing
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
GoodData
- Embedded analytics for customer-facing SaaS products
Sigma Computing
- Spreadsheet-like, Excel-style interface on a cloud data warehouse
- Named among leading BI platforms and shortlists
- Enterprise-style annual custom-quote contracts, often starting at $30,000 or more per year
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “GoodData vs Sigma Computing”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/gooddata-vs-sigma-computing, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.