Skip to content
SlateIndex
GoodDataAnalytics, AI, and agents on one data serving plane
vs
ThoughtSpotGoverned AI for Analytics, Everywhere Work Happens
Comparison · Business Intelligence · weekly run Nov 2

GoodData vs ThoughtSpot

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

ThoughtSpot is the stronger AI pick in Business Intelligence: it has a visibility score of 20 versus 0.9 for GoodData, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.

Choose GoodData if…

  • AI answers describe it more positively (67% vs 50% positive)
  • You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
  • You need SOC 2 Type II or WCAG 2.1 AA coverage
  • Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat

Choose ThoughtSpot if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (20 vs 0.9)
  • You want a free plan to start
  • You need SOC 1 or SOC 2 or SOC 3 or CSA STAR or HIPAA or EU-US DPF or Swiss-US DPF or UK Extension to EU-US DPF or CCPA coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 2

Metric GoodData ThoughtSpot
Visibility score0.9%20%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Business Intelligence#30#7
Share of voice0.5%6.5%
Mentions this run333
Positive in AI answers67%50%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2GoodData 1%

GoodData 0pp · ThoughtSpot 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

ThoughtSpot leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
1.9%
18.1%
AI Mode
0%
24.3%
Perplexity
0.9%
17.6%
GoodDataThoughtSpot

Head to head in AI answers

3 engine answers name both brands

0GoodData ranked higher
3ThoughtSpot ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionGoodDataThoughtSpot
Pricing modelFlat tiersPer seat
Entry priceContact salesFree; paid from $25 per seat / mo
Free planNo · 30-day trialYes
DeploymentFully managed SaaS on AWS and Azure, with dedicated cluster, multi-region and self-hosted options on demandDeploy in your region, with dedicated single-tenant and customer-managed key options
Integrations—30+
ComplianceSOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR, WCAG 2.1 AASOC 1, SOC 2, SOC 3, ISO 27001, CSA STAR, HIPAA, GDPR, EU-US DPF, Swiss-US DPF, UK Extension to EU-US DPF, CCPA
Support24/7 technical support worldwide, Community support through a Slack channel, Enterprise: 24/7 prioritized SLAs and a dedicated customer success manager, Enterprise: 99.5% guaranteed uptime SLAEnterprise Support with 1 hr SLA, Support Center, Community, Documentation
Founded20072012
HeadquartersSan Francisco, California, United StatesMountain View, California, US
Employees201–500501–1,000
FundingLast raise (CB Insights)Series F-1 · $674M raised
Best forSmall and medium companies on the Professional plan, and large enterprises on the Enterprise plan, that build embedded analytics, data products and governed AI on one platformBusiness leaders, data leaders and analysts, and product teams or developers who need governed analytics available to everyone in the business

Plans side by side

GoodData

ProfessionalCustomplatform fee + per workspace
EnterpriseCustomcustom use-case-based pricing
GoodData pricing

ThoughtSpot

Essentials$25user / month (billed annually)
Pro$50user / month (billed annually)
Pro (usage-based)$0.1credit
EnterpriseCustomcustom pricing
Embedded Developer$0free for 1 year
Embedded EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
ThoughtSpot pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

GoodData

  • Embedded analytics for customer-facing SaaS products

    ThoughtSpot

    • search-driven and AI-powered analytics
    • natural language and conversational business insights
    • frequently recommended in BI shortlists
    • good for scaling data culture across teams
    • free 14-day trial without a credit card

      Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “GoodData vs ThoughtSpot”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/gooddata-vs-thoughtspot, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.