GoodTimeSmarter Interview Scheduling, Better Experiences
vs
HiredRecruiting
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
GoodTime vs Hired
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Hired is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 3.3 versus 0 for GoodTime.
Choose GoodTime if…
- You need SOC 2 Type II (ISAE-3000) or SOC 3 or ISO/IEC 42001 or GDPR or CCPA coverage
Choose Hired if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.3 vs 0)
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | GoodTime | Hired |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0% | 3.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #76 | #25 |
| Share of voice | 0% | 0.7% |
| Mentions this run | 0 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
GoodTime 0pp · Hired 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Hired leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
GoodTimeHired
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0GoodTime ranked higher
0Hired ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | GoodTime | Hired |
|---|---|---|
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II (ISAE-3000), SOC 3, ISO/IEC 42001, GDPR, CCPA | — |
| Support | Customer Help Center | — |
| Founded | 2016 | — |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California, US | Jacksonville, Florida, USA (parent LHH) |
| Employees | 51–200 | 5,000+ |
| Funding | Seed (seed/angel) | Series D · $133M raised |
| Best for | Enterprise talent teams that run complex panel, multi-day and high-volume interview scheduling. | Employers hiring tech and sales talent |
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “GoodTime vs Hired”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/goodtime-vs-hired, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.