GroundcoverThe full-stack observability platform for engineers & agents
vs
TempoOpen-source, high-scale distributed tracing backend
Comparison · Observability · weekly run Nov 3
Groundcover vs Tempo
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Tempo is the stronger AI pick in Observability: it has a visibility score of 7.1 versus 2.4 for Groundcover, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Groundcover if…
- You need CCPA coverage
- Predictable flat per-node pricing
Choose Tempo if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (7.1 vs 2.4)
- AI answers describe it more positively (6% vs 0% positive)
- You need SOC 2 or ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO 22301 or PCI DSS v4.0.1 or FedRAMP High or TISAX or CSA STAR or TX-RAMP Level 2 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Groundcover | Tempo |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.4% | 7.1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Observability | #23 | #12 |
| Share of voice | 0.5% | 3.1% |
| Mentions this run | 3 | 18 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 6% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Groundcover 0pp · Tempo 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Tempo leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
GroundcoverTempo
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
0Groundcover ranked higher
1Tempo ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Groundcover | Tempo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alternatives to the most popular observability platform | ChatGPT | #16 | #6 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Groundcover | Tempo |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $30 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Bring Your Own Cloud: the data plane runs inside the customer's VPC and is managed by groundcover. A fully on-premises option is offered on the On Premise plan. | Managed as Grafana Cloud or self-hosted on Kubernetes via Helm |
| Compliance | GDPR, CCPA | SOC 2, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO 22301, PCI DSS v4.0.1, GDPR, FedRAMP High, TISAX, CSA STAR, TX-RAMP Level 2 |
| Support | Slack community support (Free plan), Standard support (Pro plan), Premium support (Enterprise plan) | — |
| Founded | 2021 | — |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | New York, NY |
| Employees | 51–200 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Series A · $160M raised | Series E · $1100M raised |
| Best for | Engineering teams running cloud-native and Kubernetes workloads that want full-stack observability without code changes and predictable pricing. | — |
Plans side by side
Groundcover
Free$0
Pro$30per host, per month
Enterprise$35per host, per month
On Premise$50per host, per month
Tempo
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Groundcover
- Predictable flat per-node pricing
- Pricing claims should be verified before purchase
Tempo
- Open-source and cost-effective
- Mature Prometheus, Loki and Grafana ecosystem
- Distributed tracing for traces
- Integrates smoothly with OpenTelemetry
- Managed option with a permanent free tier
- Demands significant internal engineering time to maintain and scale
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Groundcover vs Tempo”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/groundcover-vs-tempo, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.