H2O.aiThe Trusted Sovereign AI Platform
vs
UiPathBusiness orchestration and automation for AI agents, robots, and people
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3
H2O.ai vs UiPath
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
UiPath is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 3.5 versus 0.4 for H2O.ai.
Choose H2O.ai if…
- You need SOC 2 Type II or FedRAMP High coverage
- Explainable, open-source-driven predictive and agentic tooling
- Go-to platform for automated machine learning (AutoML)
- Robust enterprise modeling and rapid deployment
Choose UiPath if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.5 vs 0.4)
- AI answers describe it more positively (38% vs 29% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 1 Type 2 or SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or ISO 9001:2015 or HITRUST or C5 coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | H2O.ai | UiPath |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.4% | 3.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #70 | #28 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 1.3% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 9 |
| Positive in AI answers | 29% | 38% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
H2O.ai 0pp · UiPath 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
UiPath leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
H2O.aiUiPath
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0H2O.ai ranked higher
0UiPath ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | H2O.ai | UiPath |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $25 / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | On-premises, fully air-gapped, private cloud, or public cloud | Cloud (Automation Cloud, with regional or dedicated options) or self-hosted on premises, including air-gapped |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, FedRAMP High | SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, ISO 9001:2015, HITRUST, HIPAA, C5 |
| Support | Forward Deployed Engineers embedded on-site | Bronze Support (Basic tier), UiPath Community Forum |
| Founded | 2012 | 2005 |
| Headquarters | Mountain View, California, United States | New York City, NY, United States |
| Employees | 201–500 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Series E · $250M raised | IPO (NYSE: PATH) · $1970M raised |
| Best for | Regulated enterprises and public-sector agencies that need predictive, generative and agentic AI on their own infrastructure, including air-gapped deployments. | Large enterprises and regulated industries that need agents, robots, and people governed on one platform |
Plans side by side
H2O.ai
Pricing not available.
UiPath
Community$0free forever
Basic$25per month (starting at)
StandardCustomcontact sales
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
H2O.ai
- Explainable, open-source-driven predictive and agentic tooling
- Go-to platform for automated machine learning (AutoML)
- Robust enterprise modeling and rapid deployment
- Listed among enterprise end-to-end MLOps platforms
UiPath
- Excellent for enterprise agentic automation blending RPA with AI decision-making
- Fast implementation times compared with peers
- Rated Exemplary by ISG
- Strong for workflow automation, RPA, and complex business processes
- Good for automating operational processes across multiple applications
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “H2O.ai vs UiPath”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/h2o-ai-vs-uipath, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.