HiredRecruiting
vs
MonsterRecruiting
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
Hired vs Monster
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Hired is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 3.3 versus 1.8 for Monster.
Choose Hired if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.3 vs 1.8)
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
Choose Monster if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (50% vs 0% positive)
- Large-scale or hourly hiring option
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Hired | Monster |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 3.3% | 1.8% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #25 | #42 |
| Share of voice | 0.7% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 3 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 50% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Hired 0pp · Monster 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Hired leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
HiredMonster
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Hired ranked higher
0Monster ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Hired | Monster |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | — | 1994 |
| Headquarters | Jacksonville, Florida, USA (parent LHH) | Weston, Massachusetts |
| Employees | 5,000+ | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Series D · $133M raised | Growth equity · $58M raised |
| Best for | Employers hiring tech and sales talent | — |
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Hired
Profile in progress.
Monster
- Large-scale or hourly hiring option
- Employer accounts require choosing a paid posting or subscription plan
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Hired vs Monster”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/hired-vs-monster, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.