HiredRecruiting
vs
OpenCATSFree, open-source applicant tracking that stays in your hands
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
Hired vs OpenCATS
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Hired is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 3.3 versus 0.6 for OpenCATS.
Choose Hired if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.3 vs 0.6)
Choose OpenCATS if…
No clear advantage in the published data.
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Hired | OpenCATS |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 3.3% | 0.6% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #25 | #61 |
| Share of voice | 0.7% | 0.2% |
| Mentions this run | 3 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Hired 0pp · OpenCATS 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Hired leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
HiredOpenCATS
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Hired ranked higher
0OpenCATS ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Hired | OpenCATS |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | — | Self-hosted |
| Support | — | Community forum, Subreddit for peer-to-peer user support, Public installation documentation |
| Headquarters | Jacksonville, Florida, USA (parent LHH) | — |
| Employees | 5,000+ | — |
| Funding | Series D · $133M raised | — |
| Best for | Employers hiring tech and sales talent | Staffing agencies, internal recruiting teams and hiring workflows that want self-hosted control of their recruiting data |
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Hired vs OpenCATS”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/hired-vs-opencats, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.