Hopsworks vs Jupyter
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Jupyter is the stronger AI pick in MLOps Platforms: it has a visibility score of 4.6 versus 0.3 for Hopsworks, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Hopsworks if…
- You need ISO 27001 or SOC 2 Type II or GDPR or HIPAA coverage
Choose Jupyter if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (4.6 vs 0.3)
- Interactive notebook environments
- Support for data visualization and experiment tracking
- Included in common ML frameworks and environments
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Hopsworks | Jupyter |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.3% | 4.6% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in MLOps Platforms | #52 | #20 |
| Share of voice | 0.1% | 0.7% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 5 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Hopsworks 0pp · Jupyter 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Jupyter leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Hopsworks | Jupyter |
|---|---|---|---|
| What should an MLOps platform integrate with? | ChatGPT | #10 | #6 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Hopsworks | Jupyter |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | — |
| Entry price | Contact sales | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Fully managed SaaS, self-hosted on Kubernetes, on-premises, air-gapped and hybrid | Self-hosted on centralized on-premises or off-site infrastructure, scalable with Docker and Kubernetes; the project does not provide Jupyter as a service. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, HIPAA | — |
| Support | Community support, Dedicated support team and custom integrations on Enterprise plan, Platform SLA on Enterprise plan | Community Discourse forum, Jupyter Security GitHub repository, Third-party Jupyter support companies |
| Founded | 2017 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Stockholm, Sweden | Berkeley, United States |
| Employees | 11–50 | 11–50 |
| Funding | Series B | Foundation pledges (Sloan, Moore, Helmsley Charitable Trust) |
| Best for | Teams building production ML systems that need real-time feature serving and reuse of features across models | Companies, classrooms and research labs that need interactive notebooks for data science, scientific computing and machine learning. |
Plans side by side
Jupyter
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Hopsworks
Profile in progress.
Jupyter
- Interactive notebook environments
- Support for data visualization and experiment tracking
- Included in common ML frameworks and environments
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Hopsworks vs Jupyter”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/hopsworks-vs-jupyter, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.