Hopsworks vs Kubeflow
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Kubeflow is the stronger AI pick in MLOps Platforms: it has a visibility score of 20.1 versus 0.3 for Hopsworks, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Hopsworks if…
- You need ISO 27001 or SOC 2 Type II or GDPR or HIPAA coverage
Choose Kubeflow if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (20.1 vs 0.3)
- AI answers describe it more positively (17% vs 0% positive)
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (51–200 employees)
- free and open source
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Hopsworks | Kubeflow |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.3% | 20.1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in MLOps Platforms | #52 | #9 |
| Share of voice | 0.1% | 5.8% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 39 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 17% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Hopsworks 0pp · Kubeflow 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Kubeflow leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Hopsworks | Kubeflow |
|---|---|---|---|
| What should an MLOps platform integrate with? | ChatGPT | #10 | #7 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Hopsworks | Kubeflow |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | — |
| Entry price | Contact sales | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Fully managed SaaS, self-hosted on Kubernetes, on-premises, air-gapped and hybrid | Runs as a collection of microservices on any Kubernetes cluster, including on-premises, hybrid, and AWS, Azure, or GCP. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, HIPAA | — |
| Support | Community support, Dedicated support team and custom integrations on Enterprise plan, Platform SLA on Enterprise plan | Weekly community calls, Mailing list, Slack workspace |
| Founded | 2017 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Stockholm, Sweden | Sunnyvale, CA, United States |
| Employees | 11–50 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series B | — |
| Best for | Teams building production ML systems that need real-time feature serving and reuse of features across models | — |
Plans side by side
Kubeflow
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Hopsworks
Profile in progress.
Kubeflow
- free and open source
- strong choice for Kubernetes-native, cloud-native ML platforms
- portability and deep infrastructure control
- modular, open-source infrastructure
- operationally complex, especially for small teams
- requires Kubernetes expertise and significant infrastructure ownership
- Kubernetes operations add infrastructure costs
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Hopsworks vs Kubeflow”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/hopsworks-vs-kubeflow, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.