Hopsworks vs Prometheus Group
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Prometheus Group is the stronger AI pick in MLOps Platforms: it has a visibility score of 3.7 versus 0.3 for Hopsworks, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose Hopsworks if…
- You want a free plan to start
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need ISO 27001 or SOC 2 Type II or GDPR or HIPAA coverage
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than per seat
Choose Prometheus Group if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.7 vs 0.3)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Hopsworks | Prometheus Group |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.3% | 3.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in MLOps Platforms | #52 | #22 |
| Share of voice | 0.1% | 1.1% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 8 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Hopsworks 0pp · Prometheus Group 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Prometheus Group leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Hopsworks | Prometheus Group |
|---|---|---|---|
| What should an MLOps platform integrate with? | ChatGPT | #10 | #17 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Hopsworks | Prometheus Group |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Per seat |
| Entry price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Deployment | Fully managed SaaS, self-hosted on Kubernetes, on-premises, air-gapped and hybrid | — |
| Compliance | ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, HIPAA | SOC 2 Type 2 |
| Support | Community support, Dedicated support team and custom integrations on Enterprise plan, Platform SLA on Enterprise plan | Dedicated project manager and experienced services team through implementation, Consulting services and bundled training and support |
| Founded | 2017 | 1998 |
| Headquarters | Stockholm, Sweden | Raleigh, NC, United States |
| Employees | 11–50 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Series B | Private equity round · $10M raised |
| Best for | Teams building production ML systems that need real-time feature serving and reuse of features across models | Plant and facility operators in asset-intensive industries that run SAP, Oracle or IBM Maximo and need maintenance, operations and reliability teams working together. |
Plans side by side
Prometheus Group
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Hopsworks
Profile in progress.
Prometheus Group
- Collects metrics and works with Grafana for dashboards and alerts
- Common, widely used option for monitoring
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Hopsworks vs Prometheus Group”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/hopsworks-vs-prometheus, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.