HopsworksThe AI Lakehouse for Real-Time ML
vs
TectonReal-time enterprise feature store
Comparison · MLOps Platforms · weekly run Nov 2
Hopsworks vs Tecton
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Tecton is the stronger AI pick in MLOps Platforms: it has a visibility score of 1.2 versus 0.3 for Hopsworks, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Hopsworks if…
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need GDPR or HIPAA coverage
Choose Tecton if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.2 vs 0.3)
- You need GDPR (DPA available) coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Hopsworks | Tecton |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.3% | 1.2% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in MLOps Platforms | #52 | #38 |
| Share of voice | 0.1% | 0.3% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Hopsworks 0pp · Tecton 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Tecton leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
HopsworksTecton
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
0Hopsworks ranked higher
1Tecton ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Hopsworks | Tecton |
|---|---|---|---|
| What should an MLOps platform integrate with? | ChatGPT | #10 | #9 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Hopsworks | Tecton |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | — |
| Entry price | Contact sales | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Fully managed SaaS, self-hosted on Kubernetes, on-premises, air-gapped and hybrid | Hybrid SaaS, with features stored in the customer's cloud account; also offers a Virtual Private Tecton model with a shared-responsibility split |
| Compliance | ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, HIPAA | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR (DPA available) |
| Support | Community support, Dedicated support team and custom integrations on Enterprise plan, Platform SLA on Enterprise plan | — |
| Founded | 2017 | — |
| Headquarters | Stockholm, Sweden | San Francisco, California (Databricks, parent company) |
| Employees | 11–50 | — |
| Funding | Series B | Seed and Series A · $160M raised |
| Best for | Teams building production ML systems that need real-time feature serving and reuse of features across models | Larger teams running production ML and AI systems that need real-time features |
Plans side by side
Tecton
Pricing not available.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Hopsworks vs Tecton”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/hopsworks-vs-tecton, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.