Hopsworks vs Weights & Biases
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Weights & Biases is the stronger AI pick in MLOps Platforms: it has a visibility score of 29.7 versus 0.3 for Hopsworks.
Choose Hopsworks if…
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need ISO 27001 or GDPR or HIPAA coverage
Choose Weights & Biases if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (29.7 vs 0.3)
- AI answers describe it more positively (53% vs 0% positive)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017:2015 or ISO/IEC 27018:2019 coverage
- Polished, developer-first experiment tracking
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Hopsworks | Weights & Biases |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.3% | 29.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in MLOps Platforms | #52 | #6 |
| Share of voice | 0.1% | 7% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 47 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 53% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Hopsworks 0pp · Weights & Biases 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Weights & Biases leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Hopsworks | Weights & Biases |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | — |
| Entry price | Contact sales | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Fully managed SaaS, self-hosted on Kubernetes, on-premises, air-gapped and hybrid | Data residency and isolated compute and storage are supported |
| Compliance | ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, HIPAA | ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017:2015, ISO/IEC 27018:2019, SOC 2 Type II |
| Support | Community support, Dedicated support team and custom integrations on Enterprise plan, Platform SLA on Enterprise plan | — |
| Founded | 2017 | — |
| Headquarters | Stockholm, Sweden | — |
| Employees | 11–50 | — |
| Funding | Series B | $50M round led by Daniel Gross and Nat Friedman |
| Best for | Teams building production ML systems that need real-time feature serving and reuse of features across models | — |
Plans side by side
Weights & Biases
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Hopsworks
Profile in progress.
Weights & Biases
- Polished, developer-first experiment tracking
- Strong LLM observability and evaluation
- Hyperparameter optimization and sweeps
- Good collaboration features for teams
- Highly rated by users, about 4.5/5 on G2
- Pricing is unclear and usage-based charges may apply
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Hopsworks vs Weights & Biases”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/hopsworks-vs-weights-biases, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.