IBM MaximoIntelligent scheduling, dispatch and mobile asset data for field service teams
vs
SkeduloField work and shifts, planned together.
Comparison · Field Service Management · weekly run Nov 3
IBM Maximo vs Skedulo
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Skedulo is the stronger AI pick in Field Service Management: it has a visibility score of 1.1 versus 0.3 for IBM Maximo.
Choose IBM Maximo if…
- You need ISO 27001 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
Choose Skedulo if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.1 vs 0.3)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | IBM Maximo | Skedulo |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.3% | 1.1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Field Service Management | #36 | #33 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 0.2% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
IBM Maximo 0pp · Skedulo 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Skedulo leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
IBM MaximoSkedulo
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0IBM Maximo ranked higher
0Skedulo ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | IBM Maximo | Skedulo |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | SaaS on IBM Cloud; MAS 9.x also runs on Red Hat OpenShift | Cloud, in a separate Skedulo tenant for each customer |
| Compliance | ISO 27001 | — |
| Founded | — | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Armonk, NY | San Francisco, CA, USA |
| Employees | 5,000+ | 201–500 |
| Funding | — | Early Funding · $115M raised |
| Best for | — | Organizations whose teams deliver care, install equipment or maintain sites, with fixed-site shifts, mobile field visits or both. |
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “IBM Maximo vs Skedulo”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/ibm-maximo-vs-skedulo, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.