IroncladThe AI CLM that unlocks intelligence from every contract.
vs
QuoterQuoting, Contracts & Payments
Comparison · Proposals & Contracts · weekly run Nov 2
Ironclad vs Quoter
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Ironclad is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 15 versus 0 for Quoter.
Choose Ironclad if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (15 vs 0)
- You need SOC 1 Type II or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or GDPR or HIPAA or CSA Trusted Provider coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
- Streamlined, digital-first contract lifecycle management
Choose Quoter if…
- You need SOC 3 report coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Ironclad | Quoter |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 15% | 0% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #9 | #51 |
| Share of voice | 4.3% | 0% |
| Mentions this run | 23 | 0 |
| Positive in AI answers | 45% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Ironclad 0pp · Quoter 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Ironclad leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
IroncladQuoter
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Ironclad ranked higher
0Quoter ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Ironclad | Quoter |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Usage-based |
| Entry price | — | $299 / mo |
| Free plan | — | No |
| Onboarding fee | — | $495 |
| Deployment | Cloud-based | — |
| Integrations | 8000+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, GDPR, HIPAA, CSA Trusted Provider | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, SOC 3 report |
| Support | Help Center, Academy, Community, Dedicated customer success team | Help Center, Live support on every paid plan, Customer Success onboarding for Quoter activation |
| Founded | 2014 | — |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California | Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Series E · $333M raised | Seed VC, Cohesive Capital Partners named as investor |
| Best for | Enterprises whose legal, procurement, sales and IT teams all need to manage contracts in one system. | MSPs that need quoting, contracts and payments in one workflow |
Plans side by side
Ironclad
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Ironclad
- Streamlined, digital-first contract lifecycle management
- Named a market leader for digital contracting workflows
- Robust repository search and tracking
- Approval, negotiation, and routing automation
- Suited to enterprise legal contract governance
Quoter
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Ironclad vs Quoter”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/ironclad-vs-quoter, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.