Skip to content
SlateIndex
IroncladThe AI CLM that unlocks intelligence from every contract.
vs
ProposifyProposal software that gives you control and insight into the close.
Comparison · Proposals & Contracts · weekly run Nov 2

Ironclad vs Proposify

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Proposify is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 41.4 versus 15 for Ironclad, and ranks ahead in 74% of the answers that name both.

Choose Ironclad if…

  • You need SOC 1 Type II or SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or HIPAA or CSA Trusted Provider coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
  • Streamlined, digital-first contract lifecycle management
  • Named a market leader for digital contracting workflows

Choose Proposify if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (41.4 vs 15)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (49% vs 45% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 coverage
  • Visually rich, branded proposal design

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 2

Metric Ironclad Proposify
Visibility score15%41.4%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Proposals & Contracts#9#2
Share of voice4.3%9.4%
Mentions this run2349
Positive in AI answers45%49%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Ironclad 15%

Ironclad 0pp · Proposify 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Proposify leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
24.4%
50.9%
AI Mode
9.6%
39.3%
Perplexity
10.9%
33.9%
IroncladProposify

Head to head in AI answers

19 engine answers name both brands

5Ironclad ranked higher
14Proposify ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionIroncladProposify
Pricing model—Per seat
Entry price—$49 per seat / mo
Free plan—No · 14-day trial
DeploymentCloud-basedCloud-hosted SaaS
Integrations8000+—
ComplianceSOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, GDPR, HIPAA, CSA Trusted ProviderSOC 2 Type 2, GDPR
SupportHelp Center, Academy, Community, Dedicated customer success teamEmail and chat support, Phone and Zoom support, Dedicated success manager on Scale plan, Priority support
Founded20142013
HeadquartersSan Francisco, CaliforniaHalifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Employees501–1,00051–200
FundingSeries E · $333M raisedGrowth Equity - II (CB Insights)
Best forEnterprises whose legal, procurement, sales and IT teams all need to manage contracts in one system.Busy sales teams that send proposals and quotes, such as consultants and service firms in landscaping, janitorial and construction.

Plans side by side

Ironclad

Pricing not available.

Proposify

Build$49user/month (monthly); $39/user/mo billed annually ($468/user/year)
Grow$65user/month, billed annually ($780/user/year)
Scale$12,800year platform fee, includes 10 users; extra users $780/user/year
Proposify pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Ironclad

  • Streamlined, digital-first contract lifecycle management
  • Named a market leader for digital contracting workflows
  • Robust repository search and tracking
  • Approval, negotiation, and routing automation
  • Suited to enterprise legal contract governance

    Proposify

    • Visually rich, branded proposal design
    • Robust tracking and granular proposal analytics
    • Well-regarded with strong user satisfaction
    • Quotes and contracts with built-in approval workflows
    • Discounted annual pricing lowers effective per-user cost

      Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “Ironclad vs Proposify”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/ironclad-vs-proposify, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.