Kilo CodeOpen source AI coding agent in IDE, CLI and Cloud
vs
LookerAgentic business intelligence and embedded analytics on Google Cloud
Comparison · AI Coding Assistants · weekly run Nov 3
Kilo Code vs Looker
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Looker is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 8.3 versus 5.3 for Kilo Code.
Choose Kilo Code if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (100% vs 30% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- Useful AI coding agent inside the IDE
- Low subscription costs and no vendor lock-in
Choose Looker if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (8.3 vs 5.3)
- You need SOC 2 or ISO 27001 or FedRAMP or HIPAA coverage
- Governed semantic layer and metric consistency
- Strong integration with Google Cloud, BigQuery and Workspace
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Kilo Code | Looker |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 5.3% | 8.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Coding Assistants | #17 | #11 |
| Share of voice | 1.1% | 3.2% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 17 |
| Positive in AI answers | 100% | 30% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Kilo Code 0pp · Looker 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Looker leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Kilo CodeLooker
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Kilo Code ranked higher
0Looker ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Kilo Code | Looker |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $15 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | IDE, CLI and cloud; local models supported; the open-source code can be self-hosted | Google Cloud |
| Compliance | — | SOC 2, ISO 27001, FedRAMP, HIPAA |
| Support | Community support on the Individual plan, Priority support on the Teams plan, Dedicated support channels and SLA commitments on the Enterprise plan | — |
| Funding | Seed · $8M raised | Series E · $280M raised |
| Best for | Developers and teams who want an open-source AI coding agent that works with their own model keys or local models across IDE, CLI and cloud. | — |
Plans side by side
Kilo Code
Free$0free for individuals; usage billed separately
Teams$15user/month
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Looker
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Kilo Code
- Useful AI coding agent inside the IDE
- Low subscription costs and no vendor lock-in
Looker
- Governed semantic layer and metric consistency
- Strong integration with Google Cloud, BigQuery and Workspace
- Developer-centric data modeling via LookML
- Around 4.5 out of 5 stars on Gartner Peer Insights
- Quote-only enterprise pricing starting above $60,000 a year
- Poor fit for NoSQL-heavy data stacks or standalone embedded needs
- Less suited to teams using macOS without virtual machines
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Kilo Code vs Looker”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/kilo-code-vs-looker, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.