Kilo CodeOpen source AI coding agent in IDE, CLI and Cloud
vs
Snyk CodeFind, prioritize, and auto-fix issues with dev-focused SAST solutions
Comparison · AI Coding Assistants · weekly run Nov 3
Kilo Code vs Snyk Code
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Kilo Code is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 5.3 versus 0.7 for Snyk Code.
Choose Kilo Code if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (5.3 vs 0.7)
- You want a lower entry price ($15 vs $25)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
Choose Snyk Code if…
- You need ISO 27001 or ISO 27017 or SOC 2 Type II coverage
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than per seat
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Kilo Code | Snyk Code |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 5.3% | 0.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Coding Assistants | #17 | #29 |
| Share of voice | 1.1% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 100% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Kilo Code 0pp · Snyk Code 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Kilo Code leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Kilo CodeSnyk Code
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Kilo Code ranked higher
0Snyk Code ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Kilo Code | Snyk Code |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Usage-based |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $15 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $25 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | IDE, CLI and cloud; local models supported; the open-source code can be self-hosted | — |
| Integrations | — | 109+ |
| Compliance | — | ISO 27001, ISO 27017, SOC 2 Type II |
| Support | Community support on the Individual plan, Priority support on the Teams plan, Dedicated support channels and SLA commitments on the Enterprise plan | Next business day support on the Team plan, Premium support and services available |
| Founded | — | 2015 |
| Headquarters | — | Boston, MA, USA |
| Employees | — | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Seed · $8M raised | Series G |
| Best for | Developers and teams who want an open-source AI coding agent that works with their own model keys or local models across IDE, CLI and cloud. | Development teams that want SAST findings and automatic fixes inside their IDE and pull requests. |
Plans side by side
Kilo Code
Free$0free for individuals; usage billed separately
Teams$15user/month
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Snyk Code
Free$0month
Team$25month, billed monthly, up to 10 developers
EnterpriseCustomcustom, contact sales
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Kilo Code
- Useful AI coding agent inside the IDE
- Low subscription costs and no vendor lock-in
Snyk Code
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Kilo Code vs Snyk Code”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/kilo-code-vs-snyk-code, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.