Skip to content
SlateIndex
CursorAI Coding Agent for Building Ambitious Software
vs
Snyk CodeFind, prioritize, and auto-fix issues with dev-focused SAST solutions
Comparison · AI Coding Assistants · weekly run Nov 3

Cursor vs Snyk Code

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Cursor is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 67.7 versus 0.7 for Snyk Code, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.

Choose Cursor if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (67.7 vs 0.7)
  • You need AIUC-1 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 coverage
  • Strong codebase indexing and multi-file editing
  • High user satisfaction and momentum

Choose Snyk Code if…

  • You need ISO 27001 or ISO 27017 coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Cursor Snyk Code
Visibility score67.7%0.7%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in AI Coding Assistants#2#29
Share of voice13.6%0.4%
Mentions this run652
Positive in AI answers53%—

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Cursor 68%

Cursor 0pp · Snyk Code 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Cursor leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
78.7%
0.9%
AI Mode
73.5%
0%
Perplexity
50.9%
1.1%
CursorSnyk Code

Head to head in AI answers

2 engine answers name both brands

2Cursor ranked higher
0Snyk Code ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionCursorSnyk Code
Pricing model—Usage-based
Entry price—Free; paid from $25 / mo
Free plan—Yes
DeploymentDesktop, CLI, web, mobile and cloud agents—
Integrations—109+
ComplianceAIUC-1, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001, ISO 27017, SOC 2 Type II
SupportCustomer support by email at hi@cursor.com, Priority support on the Enterprise planNext business day support on the Team plan, Premium support and services available
Founded—2015
Headquarters—Boston, MA, USA
Employees501–1,0001,001–5,000
FundingFunding round at $9.9B valuationSeries G
Best forIndividual developers and engineering teams that hand coding tasks to AI agents, and larger organizations that need enterprise security and admin controls.Development teams that want SAST findings and automatic fixes inside their IDE and pull requests.

Plans side by side

Cursor

Pricing not available.

Snyk Code

Free$0month
Team$25month, billed monthly, up to 10 developers
EnterpriseCustomcustom, contact sales
Snyk Code pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Cursor

  • Strong codebase indexing and multi-file editing
  • High user satisfaction and momentum
  • Top overall pick for professional developers
  • Transparent pricing tiers and annual discount
  • Free tier to try it
  • Shared credit pool makes heavy agentic usage less predictable
  • Free Hobby plan has limited usage

Snyk Code

Profile in progress.

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “Cursor vs Snyk Code”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/cursor-vs-snyk-code, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.