Kilo Code vs Sourcegraph Cody
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Sourcegraph Cody is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 7.7 versus 5.3 for Kilo Code, and ranks ahead in 50% of the answers that name both.
Choose Kilo Code if…
- You want a free plan to start
- AI answers describe it more positively (100% vs 0% positive)
- Useful AI coding agent inside the IDE
- Low subscription costs and no vendor lock-in
Choose Sourcegraph Cody if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (7.7 vs 5.3)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 coverage
- Free trial available for 30 days
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Kilo Code | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 5.3% | 7.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Coding Assistants | #17 | #12 |
| Share of voice | 1.1% | 3.3% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 16 |
| Positive in AI answers | 100% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Kilo Code 0pp · Sourcegraph Cody 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Sourcegraph Cody leads on 2 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Kilo Code | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|---|
| How do I choose an AI coding assistant for a mid-market team? | Perplexity | #4 | #5 |
| What features matter most in an AI coding assistant? | Perplexity | #2 | #1 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Kilo Code | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $15 per seat / mo | $16,000 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Deployment | IDE, CLI and cloud; local models supported; the open-source code can be self-hosted | Single-tenant cloud, self-hosted, or bring-your-own cloud for air-gapped environments |
| Compliance | — | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 |
| Support | Community support on the Individual plan, Priority support on the Teams plan, Dedicated support channels and SLA commitments on the Enterprise plan | 24×5 support, Customer success manager, Optional premium support |
| Headquarters | — | San Francisco, California, US |
| Employees | — | 51–200 |
| Funding | Seed · $8M raised | Later-stage deal · $225M raised |
| Best for | Developers and teams who want an open-source AI coding agent that works with their own model keys or local models across IDE, CLI and cloud. | Enterprise engineering teams working on large, complex codebases |
Plans side by side
Kilo Code
Sourcegraph Cody
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Kilo Code
- Useful AI coding agent inside the IDE
- Low subscription costs and no vendor lock-in
Sourcegraph Cody
- Free trial available for 30 days
- Pricing lacks transparency for small teams due to reliance on custom sales quotes
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Kilo Code vs Sourcegraph Cody”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/kilo-code-vs-sourcegraph-cody, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.