Kilo CodeOpen source AI coding agent in IDE, CLI and Cloud
vs
WarpOpen infrastructure for cloud software factories
Comparison · AI Coding Assistants · weekly run Nov 3
Kilo Code vs Warp
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Kilo Code is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 5.3 versus 1.2 for Warp.
Choose Kilo Code if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (5.3 vs 1.2)
- You want a lower entry price ($15 vs $20)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
Choose Warp if…
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 coverage
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
- best for power users
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Kilo Code | Warp |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 5.3% | 1.2% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Coding Assistants | #17 | #25 |
| Share of voice | 1.1% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 100% | 100% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Kilo Code 0pp · Warp 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Kilo Code leads on 1 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Kilo CodeWarp
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Kilo Code ranked higher
0Warp ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Kilo Code | Warp |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $15 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $20 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | IDE, CLI and cloud; local models supported; the open-source code can be self-hosted | Desktop apps plus Warp's cloud, with an option to self-host in your own VPC |
| Compliance | — | SOC 2 Type 2 |
| Support | Community support on the Individual plan, Priority support on the Teams plan, Dedicated support channels and SLA commitments on the Enterprise plan | Private email support, Dedicated account manager and shared Slack channel (Enterprise), White-glove onboarding (Enterprise) |
| Founded | — | 2020 |
| Headquarters | — | New York, NY |
| Employees | — | 51–200 |
| Funding | Seed · $8M raised | Seed · $73M raised |
| Best for | Developers and teams who want an open-source AI coding agent that works with their own model keys or local models across IDE, CLI and cloud. | Engineering teams that run AI coding agents across the terminal and cloud and want control over models and infrastructure. |
Plans side by side
Kilo Code
Free$0free for individuals; usage billed separately
Teams$15user/month
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Warp
Free$0month
Build$20month
Max$200month
Business$50per user per month, up to 25 seats
EnterpriseCustomcustom, contact sales
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Kilo Code
- Useful AI coding agent inside the IDE
- Low subscription costs and no vendor lock-in
Warp
- best for power users
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Kilo Code vs Warp”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/kilo-code-vs-warp, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.