CursorAI Coding Agent for Building Ambitious Software
vs
WarpOpen infrastructure for cloud software factories
Comparison · AI Coding Assistants · weekly run Nov 3
Cursor vs Warp
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Cursor is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 67.7 versus 1.2 for Warp, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Cursor if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (67.7 vs 1.2)
- You need AIUC-1 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or SOC 2 Type II coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
- Strong codebase indexing and multi-file editing
Choose Warp if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (100% vs 53% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 coverage
- best for power users
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Cursor | Warp |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 67.7% | 1.2% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Coding Assistants | #2 | #25 |
| Share of voice | 13.6% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 65 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 53% | 100% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Cursor 0pp · Warp 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Cursor leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CursorWarp
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
2Cursor ranked higher
0Warp ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Cursor | Warp |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are common mistakes when buying an AI coding assistant? | ChatGPT | #1 | #7 |
| Which AI coding assistant tools offer annual discounts? | ChatGPT | #1 | #3 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Cursor | Warp |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $20 / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Desktop, CLI, web, mobile and cloud agents | Desktop apps plus Warp's cloud, with an option to self-host in your own VPC |
| Compliance | AIUC-1, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, SOC 2 Type II | SOC 2 Type 2 |
| Support | Customer support by email at hi@cursor.com, Priority support on the Enterprise plan | Private email support, Dedicated account manager and shared Slack channel (Enterprise), White-glove onboarding (Enterprise) |
| Founded | — | 2020 |
| Headquarters | — | New York, NY |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Funding round at $9.9B valuation | Seed · $73M raised |
| Best for | Individual developers and engineering teams that hand coding tasks to AI agents, and larger organizations that need enterprise security and admin controls. | Engineering teams that run AI coding agents across the terminal and cloud and want control over models and infrastructure. |
Plans side by side
Cursor
Pricing not available.
Warp
Free$0month
Build$20month
Max$200month
Business$50per user per month, up to 25 seats
EnterpriseCustomcustom, contact sales
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Cursor
- Strong codebase indexing and multi-file editing
- High user satisfaction and momentum
- Top overall pick for professional developers
- Transparent pricing tiers and annual discount
- Free tier to try it
- Shared credit pool makes heavy agentic usage less predictable
- Free Hobby plan has limited usage
Warp
- best for power users
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Cursor vs Warp”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/cursor-vs-warp, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.