Skip to content
SlateIndex
CursorAI Coding Agent for Building Ambitious Software
vs
WarpOpen infrastructure for cloud software factories
Comparison · AI Coding Assistants · weekly run Nov 3

Cursor vs Warp

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Cursor is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 67.7 versus 1.2 for Warp, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.

Choose Cursor if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (67.7 vs 1.2)
  • You need AIUC-1 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or SOC 2 Type II coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
  • Strong codebase indexing and multi-file editing

Choose Warp if…

  • AI answers describe it more positively (100% vs 53% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 coverage
  • best for power users

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Cursor Warp
Visibility score67.7%1.2%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in AI Coding Assistants#2#25
Share of voice13.6%0.4%
Mentions this run652
Positive in AI answers53%100%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Cursor 68%

Cursor 0pp · Warp 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Cursor leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
78.7%
3.7%
AI Mode
73.5%
0%
Perplexity
50.9%
0%
CursorWarp

Head to head in AI answers

2 engine answers name both brands

2Cursor ranked higher
0Warp ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionCursorWarp
Pricing model—Flat tiers
Entry price—Free; paid from $20 / mo
Free plan—Yes
DeploymentDesktop, CLI, web, mobile and cloud agentsDesktop apps plus Warp's cloud, with an option to self-host in your own VPC
ComplianceAIUC-1, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, SOC 2 Type IISOC 2 Type 2
SupportCustomer support by email at hi@cursor.com, Priority support on the Enterprise planPrivate email support, Dedicated account manager and shared Slack channel (Enterprise), White-glove onboarding (Enterprise)
Founded—2020
Headquarters—New York, NY
Employees501–1,00051–200
FundingFunding round at $9.9B valuationSeed · $73M raised
Best forIndividual developers and engineering teams that hand coding tasks to AI agents, and larger organizations that need enterprise security and admin controls.Engineering teams that run AI coding agents across the terminal and cloud and want control over models and infrastructure.

Plans side by side

Cursor

Pricing not available.

Warp

Free$0month
Build$20month
Max$200month
Business$50per user per month, up to 25 seats
EnterpriseCustomcustom, contact sales
Warp pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Cursor

  • Strong codebase indexing and multi-file editing
  • High user satisfaction and momentum
  • Top overall pick for professional developers
  • Transparent pricing tiers and annual discount
  • Free tier to try it
  • Shared credit pool makes heavy agentic usage less predictable
  • Free Hobby plan has limited usage

Warp

  • best for power users

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Cursor vs Warp”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/cursor-vs-warp, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.