Kiro vs Sourcegraph Cody
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Sourcegraph Cody is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 7.7 versus 2.8 for Kiro, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Kiro if…
- You want a free plan to start
- AI answers describe it more positively (22% vs 0% positive)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001:2022 (covered under AWS certification) coverage
- Publishes clear numerical credit or request allowances
Choose Sourcegraph Cody if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (7.7 vs 2.8)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 coverage
- Free trial available for 30 days
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Kiro | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.8% | 7.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Coding Assistants | #19 | #12 |
| Share of voice | 1.3% | 3.3% |
| Mentions this run | 7 | 16 |
| Positive in AI answers | 22% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Kiro 0pp · Sourcegraph Cody 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Sourcegraph Cody leads on 2 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Kiro | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|---|
| Official website of the top AI coding assistant vendors | Perplexity | #16 | #12 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Kiro | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $20 per seat / mo | $16,000 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Deployment | Desktop IDE, command-line CLI, web browser and cloud sessions | Single-tenant cloud, self-hosted, or bring-your-own cloud for air-gapped environments |
| Integrations | 500+ | — |
| Compliance | ISO/IEC 27001:2022 (covered under AWS certification) | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 |
| Support | — | 24×5 support, Customer success manager, Optional premium support |
| Founded | 2025 | — |
| Headquarters | Seattle, Washington | San Francisco, California, US |
| Employees | — | 51–200 |
| Funding | — | Later-stage deal · $225M raised |
| Best for | Developers and teams who want spec-driven development with AI agents, including enterprises that need IAM, SSO and governance controls | Enterprise engineering teams working on large, complex codebases |
Plans side by side
Kiro
Sourcegraph Cody
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Kiro
- Publishes clear numerical credit or request allowances
- Suited to AWS-heavy enterprises needing cloud-platform integration
- Recommended as the successor to Amazon Q Developer IDE plugins
Sourcegraph Cody
- Free trial available for 30 days
- Pricing lacks transparency for small teams due to reliance on custom sales quotes
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Kiro vs Sourcegraph Cody”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/kiro-vs-sourcegraph-cody, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.