Kissflow vs UiPath
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Kissflow is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 7.7 versus 2.4 for UiPath, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Kissflow if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (7.7 vs 2.4)
- You need SOC 1 or SOC 2 or SOC 3 or ISO/IEC 27001 or GDPR or CCPA coverage
- rapid business process automation
- conversational and agentic AI app generation
Choose UiPath if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (38% vs 17% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 1 Type 2 or SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or ISO 9001:2015 or HITRUST or C5 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Kissflow | UiPath |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 7.7% | 2.4% |
| Change vs last week | down−5% | up+1.8% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #13 | #33 |
| Share of voice | 2.3% | 0.6% |
| Mentions this run | 13 | 4 |
| Positive in AI answers | 17% | 38% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Kissflow −4.999999999999999pp · UiPath +1.7999999999999998pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Kissflow leads on 2 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Kissflow | UiPath |
|---|---|---|---|
| Official website of the top low-code platform vendors | ChatGPT | #13 | #14 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Kissflow | UiPath |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $25 / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Public and private cloud hosting | Cloud (Automation Cloud, with regional or dedicated options) or self-hosted on premises, including air-gapped |
| Compliance | SOC 1, SOC 2, SOC 3, ISO/IEC 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, CCPA | SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, ISO 9001:2015, HITRUST, HIPAA, C5 |
| Support | Dedicated support throughout transformation, Training and enablement for teams, Hands-on implementation | Bronze Support (Basic tier), UiPath Community Forum |
| Founded | 2003 | 2005 |
| Headquarters | Wilmington, Delaware, United States | New York City, NY, United States |
| Employees | 201–500 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Angel · $1M raised | IPO (NYSE: PATH) · $1970M raised |
| Best for | Large enterprises and IT teams that build and govern custom internal apps on one platform. | Large enterprises and regulated industries that need agents, robots, and people governed on one platform |
Plans side by side
Kissflow
Pricing not available.
UiPath
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Kissflow
- rapid business process automation
- conversational and agentic AI app generation
- unified enterprise process automation
- ease-of-use with structured workflow governance
- highly rated by business technologists and process owners
UiPath
- Excellent for enterprise agentic automation blending RPA with AI decision-making
- Fast implementation times compared with peers
- Rated Exemplary by ISG
- Strong for workflow automation, RPA, and complex business processes
- Good for automating operational processes across multiple applications
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Kissflow vs UiPath”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/kissflow-vs-uipath, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.