LangChain vs Microsoft AutoGen
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
LangChain is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 10.4 versus 4.5 for Microsoft AutoGen, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose LangChain if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (10.4 vs 4.5)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- Stateful multi-agent orchestration via state graphs
- Strong open-source adoption with large download numbers
Choose Microsoft AutoGen if…
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
- high-concurrency asynchronous multi-agent conversations
- enterprise-grade scaling
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | LangChain | Microsoft AutoGen |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 10.4% | 4.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #12 | #26 |
| Share of voice | 2.7% | 1.2% |
| Mentions this run | 18 | 6 |
| Positive in AI answers | 17% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
LangChain 0pp · Microsoft AutoGen 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
LangChain leads on 2 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | LangChain | Microsoft AutoGen |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best AI agent platform for enterprise | AI Mode | #2 | #7 |
| Compare the leading AI Agents platforms | AI Mode | #2 | #4 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | LangChain | Microsoft AutoGen |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $39 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS), hybrid (SaaS control plane with self-hosted data plane), or self-hosted in the customer's VPC | Open-source Python library |
| Support | Community forum, Support portal, Email support, Slack | — |
| Founded | 2023 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA, United States | Redmond, Washington (parent: Microsoft) |
| Employees | 201–500 | 5,000+ |
| Funding | Series B, led by IVP | — |
| Best for | Teams building agents that need control over models, context, memory and deployment, and the ability to test, govern and improve them in production | — |
Plans side by side
LangChain
Microsoft AutoGen
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
LangChain
- Stateful multi-agent orchestration via state graphs
- Strong open-source adoption with large download numbers
- Suited to enterprise agent loops
- Heavy developer framework that requires coding
Microsoft AutoGen
- high-concurrency asynchronous multi-agent conversations
- enterprise-grade scaling
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “LangChain vs Microsoft AutoGen”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/langchain-vs-microsoft-autogen, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.