Skip to content
SlateIndex
LangfuseOpen Source Agent Evals & Observability
vs
OpenObserveHigh-performance, unified observability for the AI era
Comparison · Observability · weekly run Nov 3

Langfuse vs OpenObserve

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

OpenObserve is the stronger AI pick in Observability: it has a visibility score of 3.6 versus 1.4 for Langfuse, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.

Choose Langfuse if…

  • AI answers describe it more positively (50% vs 25% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or HIPAA-ready region or GDPR coverage
  • Discounted cloud pricing for qualifying early-stage startups
  • Well suited to evaluating and debugging LLM or agent behavior

Choose OpenObserve if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.6 vs 1.4)
  • You want a lower entry price ($0.5 vs $29)
  • You need more native integrations (150+ vs 100+)
  • transparent pay-as-you-go pricing

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Langfuse OpenObserve
Visibility score1.4%3.6%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Observability#27#16
Share of voice0.4%1.4%
Mentions this run28
Positive in AI answers50%25%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Langfuse 1%

Langfuse 0pp · OpenObserve 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

OpenObserve leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
0%
0%
AI Mode
0%
2.6%
Perplexity
4.1%
8.3%
LangfuseOpenObserve

Head to head in AI answers

1 engine answers name both brands

0Langfuse ranked higher
1OpenObserve ranked higher
PromptEngineLangfuseOpenObserve
Which observability tools offer annual discounts? Perplexity#10#6

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionLangfuseOpenObserve
Pricing modelUsage-basedUsage-based
Entry priceFree; paid from $29 / moFree; paid from $0.5 / mo
Free planYesYes
DeploymentLangfuse Cloud in US, EU, Japan and HIPAA regions, or self-hosted under the MIT licenseOpen-source self-hosted, OpenObserve Cloud, or Bring Your Own Cloud
Integrations100+150+
ComplianceSOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, HIPAA-ready region, GDPR—
SupportCommunity support via GitHub, In-app support, Private Slack or MS Teams channel on Pro and Enterprise plans, Named lead support engineer on Enterprise plansPremium support on the Enterprise plan, Architecture reviews on the Enterprise plan, SLAs on the Enterprise plan
Founded—2022
Headquarters—San Francisco, CA
Employees—11–50
FundingSeed · $4M raisedSeed
Best forEngineering teams building LLM applications and AI agents that want open-source, self-hostable tracing and evaluationTeams that want to keep all their logs, metrics and traces without Elasticsearch-level storage bills or Datadog-style per-host fees.

Plans side by side

Langfuse

Hobby$0month
Core$29month
Pro$199month
Enterprise$2,499month
Langfuse pricing

OpenObserve

Cloud Professional$0.5GB ingested, plus $0.01/GB queried, billed monthly
Cloud EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Self-Hosted Enterprise$0free up to 50 GB ingestion per day; contact sales above that
OpenObserve pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Langfuse

  • Discounted cloud pricing for qualifying early-stage startups
  • Well suited to evaluating and debugging LLM or agent behavior

    OpenObserve

    • transparent pay-as-you-go pricing
    • annual plan discount on ingestion
    • free tier with generous daily ingestion
    • free trial without credit card
    • named among the strongest shortlist options

      Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “Langfuse vs OpenObserve”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/langfuse-vs-openobserve, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.