LindyHire an AI Employee That Gets Work Done
vs
UiPathBusiness orchestration and automation for AI agents, robots, and people
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3
Lindy vs UiPath
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Lindy is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 7.4 versus 3.5 for UiPath.
Choose Lindy if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (7.4 vs 3.5)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or GDPR or PIPEDA coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
- autonomous execution of end-to-end workflows
Choose UiPath if…
- You want a lower entry price ($25 vs $29.99)
- AI answers describe it more positively (38% vs 33% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 1 Type 2 or SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or ISO 9001:2015 or HITRUST or C5 coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Lindy | UiPath |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 7.4% | 3.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #17 | #28 |
| Share of voice | 1.9% | 1.3% |
| Mentions this run | 12 | 9 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | 38% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Lindy 0pp · UiPath 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Lindy leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
LindyUiPath
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Lindy ranked higher
0UiPath ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Lindy | UiPath |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $29.99 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $25 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted | Cloud (Automation Cloud, with regional or dedicated options) or self-hosted on premises, including air-gapped |
| Integrations | 1500+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, GDPR, PIPEDA | SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, ISO 9001:2015, HITRUST, HIPAA, C5 |
| Support | Live onboarding on the Team plan, Dedicated support on the Enterprise plan, Onboarding and enablement on the Enterprise plan, Documentation | Bronze Support (Basic tier), UiPath Community Forum |
| Founded | 2023 | 2005 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA, United States | New York City, NY, United States |
| Employees | 11–50 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Unspecified round | IPO (NYSE: PATH) · $1970M raised |
| Best for | Teams that run recurring multi-tool work such as reporting, support triage, reconciliation and incident follow-up. | Large enterprises and regulated industries that need agents, robots, and people governed on one platform |
Plans side by side
Lindy
Free$0one-time free credits, no credit card required
Team$29.99user per month
EnterpriseCustomcustom
UiPath
Community$0free forever
Basic$25per month (starting at)
StandardCustomcontact sales
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Lindy
- autonomous execution of end-to-end workflows
- functions like a digital teammate
- free trial with credits, no card needed
- highest average review rating (4.9/5 on G2)
UiPath
- Excellent for enterprise agentic automation blending RPA with AI decision-making
- Fast implementation times compared with peers
- Rated Exemplary by ISG
- Strong for workflow automation, RPA, and complex business processes
- Good for automating operational processes across multiple applications
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Lindy vs UiPath”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/lindy-vs-uipath, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.