LinearThe product development system for teams and agents
vs
MotionThe AI Powered SuperApp for Work
Comparison · Project Management · weekly run Nov 3
Linear vs Motion
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Linear is the stronger AI pick in Project Management: it has a visibility score of 7.9 versus 1.1 for Motion.
Choose Linear if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (7.9 vs 1.1)
- You want a free plan to start
- You need GDPR or HIPAA (BAA available) or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 coverage
- Fast issue tracking for software engineering teams
Choose Motion if…
No clear advantage in the published data.
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Linear | Motion |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 7.9% | 1.1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Project Management | #12 | #36 |
| Share of voice | 2% | 0.3% |
| Mentions this run | 11 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 54% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Linear 0pp · Motion 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Linear leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
LinearMotion
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Linear ranked higher
0Motion ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Linear | Motion |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $10 per seat / mo | $19 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted SaaS; workspace data can be stored in the European Union or the United States | Cloud-hosted SaaS on Google Cloud Platform, with data stored in the United States |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, HIPAA (BAA available), ISO/IEC 27001:2022 | SOC 2 Type II |
| Support | Priority support (Enterprise plan), Account manager (Enterprise plan) | Email support@usemotion.com, Priority Support on Business plan, White Glove Onboarding and Support |
| Founded | 2019 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California, United States | San Francisco |
| Funding | Series C · $134M raised | Series C2 and B/C combined · $75M raised |
| Best for | Product and engineering teams that build software and want humans and AI agents working in one shared system | Professionals and small teams on the Pro AI plan, and power users and businesses with complex needs on the Business AI plan |
Plans side by side
Linear
Free$0free for everyone
Basic$10per user/month, billed yearly
Business$16per user/month, billed yearly
EnterpriseCustomannual billing only
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Linear
- Fast issue tracking for software engineering teams
- Generous free plan
- Transparent, scalable pricing tiers
- Good fit for SaaS and tech product teams
Motion
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Linear vs Motion”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/linear-vs-motion, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.