LinearThe product development system for teams and agents
vs
PlaneProject management for teams and AI agents
Comparison · Project Management · weekly run Nov 3
Linear vs Plane
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Linear is the stronger AI pick in Project Management: it has a visibility score of 7.9 versus 0 for Plane.
Choose Linear if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (7.9 vs 0)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or HIPAA (BAA available) or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 coverage
- Fast issue tracking for software engineering teams
- Generous free plan
Choose Plane if…
- You want a lower entry price ($6 vs $10)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 or ISO 27001 or CCPA coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Linear | Plane |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 7.9% | 0% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Project Management | #12 | #55 |
| Share of voice | 2% | 0% |
| Mentions this run | 11 | 0 |
| Positive in AI answers | 54% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Linear 0pp · Plane 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Linear leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
LinearPlane
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Linear ranked higher
0Plane ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Linear | Plane |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $10 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $6 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted SaaS; workspace data can be stored in the European Union or the United States | Cloud, self-hosted, and air-gapped |
| Integrations | — | 50+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, HIPAA (BAA available), ISO/IEC 27001:2022 | SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, CCPA |
| Support | Priority support (Enterprise plan), Account manager (Enterprise plan) | Talk to a human, Documentation, Developer docs, Forum |
| Founded | 2019 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California, United States | Hyderabad, India |
| Employees | — | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series C · $134M raised | Seed · $4M raised |
| Best for | Product and engineering teams that build software and want humans and AI agents working in one shared system | Product, engineering, and operations teams that want projects, docs, and AI agents in one workspace, including organizations that must self-host or run air-gapped. |
Plans side by side
Linear
Free$0free for everyone
Basic$10per user/month, billed yearly
Business$16per user/month, billed yearly
EnterpriseCustomannual billing only
Plane
Free$0per seat per month
Pro$6per seat per month
Business$13per seat per month
Enterprise GridCustomQuote on request
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Linear
- Fast issue tracking for software engineering teams
- Generous free plan
- Transparent, scalable pricing tiers
- Good fit for SaaS and tech product teams
Plane
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Linear vs Plane”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/linear-vs-plane, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.