LinkedInLinkedIn's candidate sourcing and pipeline tool for recruiters
vs
LoxoThe AI recruiting platform for scaling firms
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
LinkedIn vs Loxo
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
LinkedIn is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 19.1 versus 1.9 for Loxo, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose LinkedIn if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (19.1 vs 1.9)
- AI answers describe it more positively (26% vs 17% positive)
- Industry-standard candidate sourcing and networking reach
- Chrome extension imports candidates directly from LinkedIn
Choose Loxo if…
- 7-day free trial
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Loxo | |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 19.1% | 1.9% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #5 | #40 |
| Share of voice | 4.3% | 0.9% |
| Mentions this run | 23 | 5 |
| Positive in AI answers | 26% | 17% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
LinkedIn 0pp · Loxo 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
LinkedIn leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
LinkedInLoxo
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
1LinkedIn ranked higher
0Loxo ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Loxo | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alternatives to the most popular recruiting platform | ChatGPT | #1 | #6 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Loxo | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | $149 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | No · 7-day trial |
| Integrations | — | 100+ |
| Support | — | Dedicated success team and priority support on Enterprise plans, Free migration for Core teams of 3+ seats, with guided self-serve tooling below that |
| Founded | — | 2012 |
| Headquarters | — | Austin, Texas |
| Employees | — | 51–200 |
| Funding | IPO (NYSE) | Growth investment led by Tritium Partners · $115M raised |
| Best for | Recruiters and hiring teams who need to source professional candidates | Scaling recruiting firms, including executive search, recruiting, staffing and RPO firms, and in-house talent teams |
Plans side by side
Pricing not available.
Loxo
Core$149per user / month, billed annually
ProfessionalCustombilled annually, contact sales for pricing
EnterpriseCustomcustom annual agreement
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
- Industry-standard candidate sourcing and networking reach
- Chrome extension imports candidates directly from LinkedIn
- One-click job posting to LinkedIn and other boards
- Basic LinkedIn integration and permission settings can feel restrictive
- Integrations may not work seamlessly in practice
Loxo
- 7-day free trial
- High per-user pricing
- Annual-only plans paid upfront
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “LinkedIn vs Loxo”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/linkedin-vs-loxo, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.