Skip to content
SlateIndex
LinkedInLinkedIn's candidate sourcing and pipeline tool for recruiters
vs
TestGorillaFind great talent. Prove they can do the job.
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3

LinkedIn vs TestGorilla

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

Track both brands

The short answer

LinkedIn is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 19.1 versus 0.6 for TestGorilla, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.

Choose LinkedIn if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (19.1 vs 0.6)
  • Industry-standard candidate sourcing and networking reach
  • Chrome extension imports candidates directly from LinkedIn
  • One-click job posting to LinkedIn and other boards

Choose TestGorilla if…

  • You need GDPR compliant or SOC 2 Type II compliant coverage
  • automated sending of tests and automatic score return

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric LinkedIn TestGorilla
Visibility score19.1%0.6%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Recruiting#5#59
Share of voice4.3%0.4%
Mentions this run232
Positive in AI answers26%—

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3LinkedIn 19%

LinkedIn 0pp · TestGorilla 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

LinkedIn leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
29.6%
0.9%
AI Mode
14.4%
0.9%
Perplexity
13.3%
0%
LinkedInTestGorilla

Head to head in AI answers

2 engine answers name both brands

2LinkedIn ranked higher
0TestGorilla ranked higher
PromptEngineLinkedInTestGorilla
What should a recruiting platform integrate with? ChatGPT#1#12
What should a recruiting platform integrate with? AI Mode#4#8

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionLinkedInTestGorilla
Pricing model—Per seat
Entry price—Free; paid from $74 per seat / mo
Free plan—Yes
Compliance—GDPR compliant, SOC 2 Type II compliant
Support—Help center, 24/7 live chat, Email support, Digital onboarding guides
Founded—2020
Headquarters—Amsterdam, Netherlands
Employees—201–500
FundingIPO (NYSE)Series A · $80M raised
Best forRecruiters and hiring teams who need to source professional candidatesSmall companies with limited hiring needs (Core plan) and larger teams screening candidates at scale (Plus plan).

Plans side by side

LinkedIn

Pricing not available.

TestGorilla

Gorilla Sourcing Free$0month
Gorilla Sourcing Core$74per Sourcing seat per month, billed annually
Gorilla Sourcing Plus$134per Sourcing seat per month, billed annually
Gorilla Assessments Free$0month
Gorilla Assessments Core$215per account per month, billed annually (from)
Gorilla Assessments Plus$520per account per month, billed annually (from)
TestGorilla pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

LinkedIn

  • Industry-standard candidate sourcing and networking reach
  • Chrome extension imports candidates directly from LinkedIn
  • One-click job posting to LinkedIn and other boards
  • Basic LinkedIn integration and permission settings can feel restrictive
  • Integrations may not work seamlessly in practice

TestGorilla

  • automated sending of tests and automatic score return

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “LinkedIn vs TestGorilla”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/linkedin-vs-testgorilla, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.