Skip to content
SlateIndex
GreenhouseThe Orchestrated Hiring Ecosystem for the AI era
vs
TestGorillaFind great talent. Prove they can do the job.
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3

Greenhouse vs TestGorilla

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Greenhouse is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 38.5 versus 0.6 for TestGorilla, and ranks ahead in 50% of the answers that name both.

Choose Greenhouse if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (38.5 vs 0.6)
  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO 27001:2022 or ISO 27701:2019 or ISO 42001:2023 or GDPR or CCPA/CPRA or PCI DSS coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
  • Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat

Choose TestGorilla if…

  • You want a free plan to start
  • You need GDPR compliant or SOC 2 Type II compliant coverage
  • Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
  • automated sending of tests and automatic score return

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Greenhouse TestGorilla
Visibility score38.5%0.6%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Recruiting#1#59
Share of voice8.1%0.4%
Mentions this run432
Positive in AI answers56%—

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Greenhouse 39%

Greenhouse 0pp · TestGorilla 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Greenhouse leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
43.5%
0.9%
AI Mode
33.5%
0.9%
Perplexity
38.3%
0%
GreenhouseTestGorilla

Head to head in AI answers

2 engine answers name both brands

1Greenhouse ranked higher
1TestGorilla ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionGreenhouseTestGorilla
Pricing modelFlat tiersPer seat
Entry priceContact salesFree; paid from $74 per seat / mo
Free planNoYes
ComplianceSOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001:2022, ISO 27701:2019, ISO 42001:2023, GDPR, CCPA/CPRA, PCI DSSGDPR compliant, SOC 2 Type II compliant
Support—Help center, 24/7 live chat, Email support, Digital onboarding guides
Founded20122020
HeadquartersNew York City, NY, United StatesAmsterdam, Netherlands
Employees501–1,000201–500
FundingSeries D · $110M raisedSeries A · $80M raised
Best forEmployers that want structured, automated hiring across sourcing, interviews and the ATS, from early-stage companies to global enterprisesSmall companies with limited hiring needs (Core plan) and larger teams screening candidates at scale (Plus plan).

Plans side by side

Greenhouse

CoreCustom
PlusCustom
ProCustom
Greenhouse pricing

TestGorilla

Gorilla Sourcing Free$0month
Gorilla Sourcing Core$74per Sourcing seat per month, billed annually
Gorilla Sourcing Plus$134per Sourcing seat per month, billed annually
Gorilla Assessments Free$0month
Gorilla Assessments Core$215per account per month, billed annually (from)
Gorilla Assessments Plus$520per account per month, billed annually (from)
TestGorilla pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Greenhouse

  • Strong structured hiring and interview scorecards
  • Strong reporting and data visibility
  • Top ratings and popularity for enterprise and mid-market recruiting
  • Integration ecosystem and unified data
  • Reduces hiring bias and supports compliance

    TestGorilla

    • automated sending of tests and automatic score return

      Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “Greenhouse vs TestGorilla”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/greenhouse-vs-testgorilla, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.