LlamaIndex vs Microsoft AutoGen
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Microsoft AutoGen is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 4.5 versus 2.2 for LlamaIndex, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose LlamaIndex if…
- You need SOC 2 Type II or GDPR or HIPAA coverage
- Premier choice for RAG-centric agents
- Named as a popular agent development framework
Choose Microsoft AutoGen if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (4.5 vs 2.2)
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
- high-concurrency asynchronous multi-agent conversations
- enterprise-grade scaling
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | LlamaIndex | Microsoft AutoGen |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.2% | 4.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #41 | #26 |
| Share of voice | 0.8% | 1.2% |
| Mentions this run | 5 | 6 |
| Positive in AI answers | 20% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
LlamaIndex 0pp · Microsoft AutoGen 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Microsoft AutoGen leads on 2 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | LlamaIndex | Microsoft AutoGen |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best AI Agents tools in 2026? | AI Mode | #7 | #3 |
| Compare the leading AI Agents platforms | AI Mode | #5 | #4 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | LlamaIndex | Microsoft AutoGen |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $50 / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | LlamaParse runs as SaaS on a secure cloud tenant, or can be deployed in a customer's private VPC across cloud providers. | Open-source Python library |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, HIPAA | — |
| Support | Community, Basic (email), Priority (Slack Connect), Dedicated | — |
| Founded | — | 2023 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California, United States | Redmond, Washington (parent: Microsoft) |
| Employees | 11–50 | 5,000+ |
| Funding | Strategic minority equity investments (Databricks, KPMG) · $28M raised | — |
| Best for | Teams in document-heavy industries such as finance, insurance, healthcare and manufacturing that need accurate parsing of complex tables, charts and scanned pages. | — |
Plans side by side
Microsoft AutoGen
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
LlamaIndex
- Premier choice for RAG-centric agents
- Named as a popular agent development framework
Microsoft AutoGen
- high-concurrency asynchronous multi-agent conversations
- enterprise-grade scaling
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “LlamaIndex vs Microsoft AutoGen”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/llamaindex-vs-microsoft-autogen, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.