LookerAgentic business intelligence and embedded analytics on Google Cloud
vs
OutSystemsYour AI development platform built for the enterprise
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3
Looker vs OutSystems
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Looker is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 10.4 versus 2.8 for OutSystems, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Looker if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (10.4 vs 2.8)
- You need SOC 2 or FedRAMP coverage
- Governed semantic layer and metric consistency
- Strong integration with Google Cloud, BigQuery and Workspace
Choose OutSystems if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (42% vs 30% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 22301 or FedRAMP Authorized or PCI DSS or GDPR or ENS (Spain) or ACN (Italy) or DESC (UAE) coverage
- Enterprise-grade scalability for complex, mission-critical applications
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Looker | OutSystems |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 10.4% | 2.8% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #13 | #32 |
| Share of voice | 2.5% | 0.8% |
| Mentions this run | 17 | 5 |
| Positive in AI answers | 30% | 42% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Looker 0pp · OutSystems 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Looker leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
LookerOutSystems
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
1Looker ranked higher
0OutSystems ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Looker | OutSystems |
|---|---|---|---|
| Official website of the top AI agent platform vendors | Perplexity | #5 | #20 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Looker | OutSystems |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | Contact sales |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Google Cloud | Cloud, hybrid and sovereign cloud deployment, with a self-hosted on-premises option in certain plans |
| Integrations | — | 400+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2, ISO 27001, FedRAMP, HIPAA | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 22301, FedRAMP Authorized, HIPAA, PCI DSS, GDPR, ENS (Spain), ACN (Italy), DESC (UAE) |
| Founded | — | 2001 |
| Headquarters | — | Boston, Massachusetts, United States |
| Employees | — | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Series E · $280M raised | Series F, led by KKR |
| Best for | — | Regulated enterprises that need to modernize legacy systems and run custom apps and agents they can trust |
Plans side by side
Looker
Pricing not available.
OutSystems
OutSystems Personal Edition$0
OutSystems Agentic Systems PlatformCustomcustom quote
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Looker
- Governed semantic layer and metric consistency
- Strong integration with Google Cloud, BigQuery and Workspace
- Developer-centric data modeling via LookML
- Around 4.5 out of 5 stars on Gartner Peer Insights
- Quote-only enterprise pricing starting above $60,000 a year
- Poor fit for NoSQL-heavy data stacks or standalone embedded needs
- Less suited to teams using macOS without virtual machines
OutSystems
- Enterprise-grade scalability for complex, mission-critical applications
- High performance and speed in app delivery
- Strong analyst rankings as an enterprise low-code leader
- Full-stack web and mobile app development with omnichannel reach
- Modernizing legacy systems and deep integrations
- Quote-based, opaque enterprise pricing
- High cost for enterprise tiers
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Looker vs OutSystems”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/looker-vs-outsystems, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.