LoxoThe AI recruiting platform for scaling firms
vs
RipplingHR, IT, and Finance apps on a unified data platform
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
Loxo vs Rippling
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Rippling is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 8.1 versus 1.9 for Loxo.
Choose Loxo if…
- 7-day free trial
Choose Rippling if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (8.1 vs 1.9)
- You need more native integrations (600+ vs 100+)
- AI answers describe it more positively (55% vs 17% positive)
- You need SOC 1 Type II or SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 or CSA STAR Level 2 or ISO 27001 or ISO 27018 or ISO 42001 coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Loxo | Rippling |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.9% | 8.1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #40 | #14 |
| Share of voice | 0.9% | 2.2% |
| Mentions this run | 5 | 10 |
| Positive in AI answers | 17% | 55% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Loxo 0pp · Rippling 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Rippling leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
LoxoRippling
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Loxo ranked higher
0Rippling ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Loxo | Rippling |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | $149 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | No · 7-day trial | — |
| Deployment | — | Cloud |
| Integrations | 100+ | 600+ |
| Compliance | — | SOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, CSA STAR Level 2, ISO 27001, ISO 27018, ISO 42001 |
| Support | Dedicated success team and priority support on Enterprise plans, Free migration for Core teams of 3+ seats, with guided self-serve tooling below that | Contact page, AI assistant |
| Founded | 2012 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Austin, Texas | San Francisco, CA, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 5,000+ |
| Funding | Growth investment led by Tritium Partners · $115M raised | Series G · $1850M raised |
| Best for | Scaling recruiting firms, including executive search, recruiting, staffing and RPO firms, and in-house talent teams | Companies wanting identity, device and access management tied directly to HR and payroll data |
Plans side by side
Loxo
Core$149per user / month, billed annually
ProfessionalCustombilled annually, contact sales for pricing
EnterpriseCustomcustom annual agreement
Rippling
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Loxo
- 7-day free trial
- High per-user pricing
- Annual-only plans paid upfront
Rippling
- Unified HR, IT, and payroll in one automated system
- Strong user ratings from reviewers and analysts
- Recruiting tightly integrated with HR and payroll
- Ease of use and intuitive interface
- Expense management connected to HR and payroll
- Mandatory annual contracts with undisclosed discounts
- Custom quotes make pricing hard to compare
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Loxo vs Rippling”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/loxo-vs-rippling, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.