Skip to content
SlateIndex
LyzrTake your AI agents to production, faster.
vs
UiPathBusiness orchestration and automation for AI agents, robots, and people
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3

Lyzr vs UiPath

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

UiPath is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 3.5 versus 0.9 for Lyzr, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.

Choose Lyzr if…

  • You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or ISO 42001 or GDPR or CCPA coverage
  • specialized compliance and governance features for regulated environments

Choose UiPath if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.5 vs 0.9)
  • You want a lower entry price ($25 vs $100,000)
  • You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
  • You need SOC 1 Type 2 or SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or ISO 9001:2015 or HITRUST or C5 coverage

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Lyzr UiPath
Visibility score0.9%3.5%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in AI Agents#60#28
Share of voice0.4%1.3%
Mentions this run39
Positive in AI answers—38%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Lyzr 1%

Lyzr 0pp · UiPath 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

UiPath leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
1.9%
6.5%
AI Mode
0.9%
1.1%
Perplexity
0%
2.8%
LyzrUiPath

Head to head in AI answers

2 engine answers name both brands

0Lyzr ranked higher
2UiPath ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionLyzrUiPath
Pricing modelFlat tiersFlat tiers
Entry priceFree; paid from $100,000 / moFree; paid from $25 / mo
Free planYesYes
DeploymentHosted by Lyzr, in the customer's cloud, in their VPC, on-prem or air-gappedCloud (Automation Cloud, with regional or dedicated options) or self-hosted on premises, including air-gapped
ComplianceSOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, GDPR, HIPAA, CCPASOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, ISO 9001:2015, HITRUST, HIPAA, C5
SupportForward-deployed engineers who build alongside your team, Reimagineers who own the business result, Applied AI team for production rolloutBronze Support (Basic tier), UiPath Community Forum
Founded20232005
HeadquartersJersey City, NJNew York City, NY, United States
Employees201–5001,001–5,000
FundingSeries A+ · $15M raisedIPO (NYSE: PATH) · $1970M raised
Best forEnterprises that already run AI agents and need them governed and moved to production, especially in regulated industries such as banking, insurance and government.Large enterprises and regulated industries that need agents, robots, and people governed on one platform

Plans side by side

Lyzr

Build$0free forever
Govern$100,000year, to start
Automate workflowsCustomcustom, scoped with you
Lyzr pricing

UiPath

Community$0free forever
Basic$25per month (starting at)
StandardCustomcontact sales
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
UiPath pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Lyzr

  • specialized compliance and governance features for regulated environments
  • limited management of broad, heterogeneous third-party agent estates

UiPath

  • Excellent for enterprise agentic automation blending RPA with AI decision-making
  • Fast implementation times compared with peers
  • Rated Exemplary by ISG
  • Strong for workflow automation, RPA, and complex business processes
  • Good for automating operational processes across multiple applications

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Lyzr vs UiPath”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/lyzr-vs-uipath, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.