Marqo vs Supabase
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Supabase is the stronger AI pick in Vector Databases: it has a visibility score of 5.7 versus 0.7 for Marqo, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Marqo if…
No clear advantage in the published data.
Choose Supabase if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (5.7 vs 0.7)
- AI answers describe it more positively (18% vs 0% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO 27001 or HIPAA (BAA available) coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Marqo | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.7% | 5.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Vector Databases | #25 | #12 |
| Share of voice | 0.4% | 2.2% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 11 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 18% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Marqo 0pp · Supabase 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Supabase leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Marqo | Supabase |
|---|---|---|---|
| Official website of the top vector database vendors | Perplexity | #14 | #11 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Marqo | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $25 / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Deployed via API or one-click integrations with commerce platforms | Hosted cloud in AWS regions across the US, EU and Asia Pacific, or self-hosted open source |
| Compliance | — | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA (BAA available) |
| Support | Talk to a search expert, Book a 30-minute demo with a live proof-of-concept on your own catalog | Community support (Free plan), Email support (Pro plan), Priority email support and SLAs (Team plan), 24x7 premium enterprise support and private Slack channel (Enterprise plan) |
| Founded | 2022 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California, USA | Remote-first, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Series A · $18M raised | Series D · $1000M raised |
| Best for | Enterprise retail brands with large product catalogs in fashion, beauty, electronics and home goods | Teams building production applications on Postgres that want auth, storage, realtime and vector search in one backend |
Plans side by side
Marqo
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Marqo
Profile in progress.
Supabase
- Integrates smoothly with Firebase and Supabase
- Zero extra infrastructure when already running Postgres via Supabase
- Pay nothing extra for pgvector on an existing database
- Minimal operational overhead for existing Postgres clusters
- Offers vector search via pgvector, with customers paying only for the database
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Marqo vs Supabase”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/marqo-vs-supabase, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.